The Headline on the story was “New State Laws Take Effect: Gas Taxes, Gun Restrictions, Pool Safety”
and, in the body of the story, Governor Dannel Malloy was quoted to this effect
after he had been questioned on his increase of Connecticut’s gas tax, already
the highest in the nation: “I wasn't governor in 2005. I wasn't the minority
leader of the House or the minority leader of the Senate in 2005.''
In 2005, during the administration of Governor Jodi Rell,
the Republican governor and the Democratic dominated General Assembly had
decided to increase the tax as part of a long term plan. Mr. Malloy, a
Democrat, and the Democratic dominated General Assembly this year decided to
play the role of bystanders and let the tax increase happen.
Since Mr. Malloy had assumed his responsibilities as
governor, Republicans had been more or less sequestered by the Malloy
administration; Republicans leaders were not permitted to leave their
fingerprints on either of Mr. Malloy’s two budgets, one of which, the first,
imposed on the state the largest tax increase in its history.
This tax increase was a part of what might be called Mr.
Malloy’s “Shared Sacrifice” plan, according to which those who provide state
revenues, taxpayers, and those who consume taxes, state workers, were to share equally
the awful burdens that fell to Mr. Malloy when he became governor. Mr. Malloy’s
savings were negligible; his revenue increases were deep and permanent. Tax
payers crushed the grapes; tax consumers drank the wine.
Mr. Malloy had a plan. He executed the plan with a great
deal of assistance from Democratic leaders in the General Assembly who were
able successfully to elbow Republicans out of the budget negotiating room.
Mr. Malloy’s two budgets, then, are not the responsibility
of any previous governor, even though his two budgets were crafted, some would
say wrongheadedly, to address problems he “inherited” when he came into
office. Mr. Malloy’s patrimony as
governor, it should be noted, is not solely a bag of woe. New governors inherit
both the wins and losses of their predecessors, and every governor either
builds upon or destroys the work of politicians that preceded him. Governors
are the sum of the choices they make.
In his most recent budget, Mr. Malloy raids the state’s
transportation fund to the tune of $91 million, while at the same time imposing
the largest fuel tax increase in state history. On the matter of taxes and “revenue
enhancements,” this governor always thinks large. So depleted is the state’s
transportation fund that there may not be enough in the kitty to sustain
current transportation expenditures.
Now then, Mr. Malloy chose to cut Republicans out of budget
negotiations; he chose to impose on the state the largest tax increase in its
history; he chose to raid the already depleted transportation fund, so that he
might dump the revenue into the state’s deficit ridden general fund, where most
targeted funds and broken political promises end up. The general fund is little
more than a trash heap of good intentions.
Heath Fahle, Policy
Director of the Yankee Institute for Public Policy, hit several nails on
the head when he wrote in a column printed in CTNewsJunkie,
“As a small geographic space located directly between two of the nation’s
biggest metropolitan areas, one might think that a modern transportation system
would be a top priority. But with one in five Connecticut residents on
Medicaid, unfunded pension liabilities that under the most optimistic of
outlooks are underfunded by billions of dollars, and the worst performing
economy in the nation, it isn’t hard to figure out how infrastructure
investments were crowded out of the budget.”
The infrastructure
investment fund raid occurred around the same time as the publication of “The American Society of Civil Engineers’ 2013 Report Card” on the Nation’s
Infrastructure. "Driving on roads in need of repair costs Connecticut motorists $847 million a year in extra vehicle repairs
and operating costs,” which works out to $294 per motorist, according to the report. It’s not just the roads; the
state’s bridges are in disrepair.
At some point, people in the state
must decide whether they want a governor and a legislature focused on
re-inventing Connecticut or, more modestly, one that will repair roads and
bridges. The lesson of Daedalus hangs like a threat of doom over the haloed
heads of most world saviors: Wax wings, the ego driven flights of fancy of the
usual politician on the make, are never a match for the reality of truth in all
its fiery splendor.
Comments