On
budget matters, the governor proposes and the legislature disposes.
Connecticut’s General Assembly has in the past been disposed to tinker with
budgets presented by the state’s chief executive. No one knows precisely what the Democratic
dominated General Assembly will do to a budget that has been etch a sketched by
Governor Dannel Malloy and Democratic leaders in the General Assembly.
Once
again this fiscal year, Mr. Malloy and Democratic legislative leaders have
stiffed Republicans on budget matters. During Mr. Malloy’s first budget
negotiations, Republican leaders were shooed out of the room so they might not
interfere with delicate negotiations then underway between Mr. Malloy’s agents and
union leaders representing SEBAC, the state union conglomerate authorized to
negotiate contracts with the governor. On that occasion, Democratic leaders in
the General Assembly pre-approved a budget submitted to them by Mr. Malloy and
invested him with plenipotentiary powers to make whatever adjustments SEBAC,
Connecticut’s fourth branch of government, and the governor thought advisable.
The
budget was batted around between Mr. Malloy’s Malloyalists and union leaders. After
a few bloody rounds, a budget sprang forth about which Edith Prague, a union
friendly state senator, said that union leaders would be crazy to reject it. It
was rejected by the union crazies, more negotiations ensued, and finally a
budget was produced that, Mr. Malloy said, was balanced , contained no gimmicks,
was GAAP compliant and “fair share” observant.
Mr.
Malloy’s first budget, heavily freighted with the largest tax increase in state
history, tilted several times since it had been extruded, sausage-like, from
the Democratic dominated General Assembly. There are some number crunchers –
though none among the Malloyalist crew, save Comptroller Kevin Lembo, who
sometimes demurrers – who doubt that Mr. Malloy’s first budget ever was in
balance.
Now
comes Mr. Malloy’s second budget – and how fares it?
So
far, the second budget appears to be a deja vu all over again repeat of the first.
Republicans
– called upon by the governor to iron out in a special session a few deficit
wrinkles, a love fest praised by both Mr. Malloy and Republican leaders as a
show of non-partisanship the national government would do well to copy –
once again have been shown the door.
A
one party state like Connecticut does not need the budget input of a bystander party.
And never mind that the Connecticut Supreme Court recently ruled that
Republicans should command the top line on the ballot in future elections
because Mr. Malloy’s party garnered fewer votes than the Republican Party in
the gubernatorial election; it was THAT close, Mr. Malloy winning the election
because of votes cast by the putatively independent Working
Families Party.
Every
time Mr. Malloy failed to include Republicans in his budget negotiations he
disenfranchised the majority of Republican and Democratic Party voters who cast
their ballots in his gubernatorial election. This budget year, Mr. Malloy – who
twice refused to include Republicans in his budget deliberations – cited
Republicans in the General Assembly for failing to offer a shadow budget. Chutzpah, thy name is Malloy.
Mr. Malloy’s budget
outline will be presented to the General Assembly, which likely will tinker
with the product in an attempt to satisfy union dependent Democratic members in
the legislature.
Mr. Malloy recommended his
budget to the Democratic dominated General Assembly -- and to the general
public -- with his chest expanding to incoming Republican rhetorical bullets: “The bottom line is we will
not increase taxes or create any new taxes. The budget will be in balance and
will be GAAP-compliant.”
A
story in CTMirror added a few cautious “buts” to Mr. Malloy’s brag.
The
Malloy budget would not “increase taxes or create any new taxes” in keeping
with a previous Malloy pledge that followed the imposition of the largest tax
increase in Connecticut history. But “…it also would extend some controversial
taxes on businesses and power plants that had been set to expire next year." And but... "It
also implements one of the largest tax hikes on gasoline and other fuels in
state history on July 1 -- an increase approved in 2005 -- while diverting all
of the proceeds to non-transportation programs.” And but “…it also employs a
controversial new interpretation of Medicaid budgeting that effectively would
remove more than $1 billion from under the constitutional spending cap over the
next two fiscal years. The affected Medicaid programs are paid for up-front
with state dollars, but all costs are reimbursed with federal aid.”
Mr.
Malloy’s budget raises spending, raises taxes and is over reliant on federal reimbursements
from an Obamacare that has in it more mirrors and trapdoors than a funhouse.
Obamacare recently has met a stiff resistance from union chiefs who fear that union
membership will be reduced after the very expensive Obamacare proposition
compromises union offered health plans. No word yet from SEBAC as to whether
they will join their brothers on the union line who fear that Obamacare will
reduce both union membership and dues.
Bottom
line: Spending in Connecticut will increase under its present union reliant one
party state. And since taxation follows in the rut of spending, taxes in the future
will also increase. Neutered legislative Republicans are simply too cowardly to
place exorbitant spending rather than tax increases at the center of their assault
against a runaway progressivism -- because they too reap the political fruits
of heedless spending.
Comments