U.S. Senator Dick
Blumenthal, for 20 years Attorney General in Connecticut, has approved many a
press release in his day. Indeed, he may have underwritten most among the flood
of media releases issued in his name before leaving his cushy spot as Attorney
General and becoming a member of the U.S. Senate club. While in college at
Harvard, he was the editor of the Harvard Crimson and reported on several key
stories of the day, among them a trial in New Haven of Black Panther
terrorists.
Over a long period
in the public eye, Mr. Blumenthal has acquired certain journalistic talents,
which have aided him in cranking out emotionally appealing lede paragraphs.
Here are the first three
graphs of a column written by Mr. Blumenthal and printed in a Hartford paper
following the defeat in the U.S. Senate of a very mild, almost inoffensive,
bill that would have required background checks for gun purchases:
“On Wednesday, the
Senate said no to America. But the American people will not take no for an
answer.
“The first words I
heard when Vice President Joe Biden banged the gavel to end the vote Wednesday
on the gun purchasing background check bill were, ‘Shame on you.’ They were
from a rightfully angry mother of a Virginia Tech student who, six years ago
this week, was shot twice in the head. This heartbroken mother had the courage
to say what all of us fighting for background checks and other common-sense gun
laws were feeling.
“It was a shameful
day for our nation.”
One may assume as a
matter of course that anyone who opposes Mr. Blumenthal is shameful, but the
man who shamelessly lied about his non-service in Vietnam was not alone in his
aspersions. In the course of a few hours, everyone was sounding the same toscin,
including the visibly angry president and vice president. But it was not a
shameful day for Mr. Blumenthal, who placed himself on the shameless side of
the bill. Along with U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, Mr. Blumenthal took the lead in
the Senate agitating for passage of the doomed bill. In his home state, Mr.
Blumenthal and Mr. Murphy lent their prestige as U.S. Senators to a successful
effort in passing a gun restriction bill that has been described approvingly by
its proponents as the toughest gun restriction bill in the nation, outpacing
even Chicago, murder capital of the United States.
To his credit, Mr.
Blumenthal knocked, if only by implication, his Democratic confreres in the
Senate. The Senate needed four more Democratic votes to pass a much watered
down version of Connecticut’s strongest in the nation gun restriction bill; and,
as it happened, four Democrats in the Democratic controlled chamber voted
against the measure. If shame could have been apportioned in the Senate, the
four deserters should have received the largest portion of it. Lacking the four
necessary votes, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – who also voted against the
measure – pulled the bill. Mr. Reid said he hadn’t voted for the measure on the
floor so that he might vote against it later. The other three Democratic
Senators who voted against the measure, Mr. Blumenthal and Mr. Murphy would
have us believe, did so because they were palsied with fear owing to almost
certain campaign opposition from the National Rifle Association (NRA), which both Mr.
Murphy and Mr. Blumenthal have characterized as a toothless and very much
overrated paper tiger.
In comparison with
the gun restriction bill passed in Connecticut, the bill withdrawn by Mr. Reid
may accurately be compared to a paper tiger; which is another way of saying
that the bill, had it passed through Congress as written, would not have
addressed the root causes of the mass shootings that occurred both in Sandy Hook
and on the campus of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
in Blacksburg, Virginia, 15 years ago, when a senior at the school, Seung-Hui
Cho, shot and killed 32 people and wounded 17 others in two separate attacks
about two hours apart before committing suicide, still the deadliest shooting
incident by a single gunman in U.S. history.
Following an exhaustive investigation, it was determined that Virginia
Tech, owing to federal privacy laws, was unaware that Mr. Cho had received
special education support while in high school, that he had been accused of
stalking two female students, that he had suffered from an anxiety disorder and
that a Virginia special justice had declared Mr. Cho mentally ill, ordering him
to attend treatment, an order disregarded by his mother. The bill supported by
Mr. Blumenthal and Mr. Murphy that went down to dusty defeat in the U.S. Senate
did not strum any mental illness chords; it did not substantially alter previous
legislation that prevented Virginia Tech from acquiring access to medical
information available to high school administrators; it was simply a bill intended
to close a gap in background checks.
The rejected bill provided little more than an addendum to a largely
unenforced bill
already on the books, H.R.2640,
the provisions of which have been studiously ignored even in Connecticut, which
may now boast that it has the toughest gun regulations, rarely to be enforced,
in the nation. The bill defeated in Washington was little more than a Potemkin
Village front that may in the future serve as political luster to politicians
seeking office. Mr. Blumenthal should have been ashamed to prop up the farce.
Comments
Check his case record out when he was AG. Most cases sat in a pile on shelves after the media attention was over.
But he did ruin a few honest business owners lives. He'll never stop looking for the next crisis to solve.