The very title of the story in CTMirror
was ominous: “Howls as Malloy tries to
shorten leash on watchdogs.”
And in the lede paragraph, a dark joweled Richard Nixon is
resurrected from his bed of infamy: “Governor Dannel Malloy is attempting the
most dramatic makeover of the state's watchdog agencies since their creation as
post-Watergate reforms in the 1970s.”
Watergate redivivus!
The media knows how to raise the roof when its much vaunted
independence is threatened. And somewhere in the background a corrupt ex-felon
is rolling around in the muck: “But critics wonder why Malloy, a Democrat, is
inviting a political backlash with his second move on the watchdogs, whose
independence the General Assembly defended when a Republican governor, John G.
Rowland, tried to weaken them a decade ago.”
Rowland too? This is serious.
The three putatively “independent” agencies Mr. Malloy is
attempting to consolidate under a brand new agency, the Office of Government
Accountability or OGA, are the State Elections Enforcement Commission (SEEC),
the Office of State Ethics (OSE), and the Freedom of Information Commission
(FOIC)
In his new budget, Mr. Malloy has called for the elimination
of a Corrupticut era provision that shielded the three watchdog agencies from
budget cuts by compelling the governor to transmit his unrevised budget
requests to the watchdog solicitous General Assembly.
Once the provision is eliminated, critics suppose the
governor’s office will be able to control the three agencies' purse strings,
thus bringing them to heel whenever the FOIC orders an administrative agency to
release to the media public data that might bring a blush to the cheek of some
Malloy factotum, or the SEEC uncovers political thuggery in one or another
of the state’s urban one-party corruption pots, or the OSE finds that this or
that agency is in violation of some inscrutable ethical rule as ambiguous as
the Oracle at Delphi.
The OSE recently destroyed a quarter-century's worth of
public records detailing the finances of present and former public officials
because, said executive director Carol Carson, the agency prior to her arrival
had “suffered through well-publicized internal problems” and its records were in disarray. In fact, the operations of the agency
were also in disarray. On at least one occasion, the OSE disposed of a case
when it lacked a proper quorum to adjudicate, an oversight compliant courts are
almost certain to wink at.
Under the old dispensation, the investigative and legal
staffs of the oversight agencies are superintended by agency heads answerable
to independent citizen commissions that adjudicate elections, ethics and
Freedom of Information complaints. Under the Malloy regime, the executive
director of the new Office of Government Accountability, appointed by the
governor, would be vested with the authority to assign and/or discipline
lawyers whose duties might include the investigation of the governor. That reorganization
would pretty much turn supposed independent agencies into the governor’s liege
lords, subject always to executive whimsy.
Soon after Victims Advocate Michelle Cruz
pointed to failings in an Earned Risk Reduction Credits program fashioned by undersecretary for criminal justice policy Michael Lawlor – one of the violent criminals given credits
under Mr. Lawlor’s program celebrated his early release by murdering a store
clerk in Meriden – her job was posted and she was quickly replaced by a Cook
County, Illinois political operative.
This is not a governor who lies down quietly under the lash
of media criticism. And critics of his “independent” agency consolidations
abound. President of the Connecticut Council on Freedom of Information James
Smith quickly jumped into the flames.
"These proposals, said Mr. Smith, “can only be
explained as an effort to gain control over the guarantors of transparency and
integrity in government. We ask why the Malloy administration is determined to
emasculate the independent watchdogs?"
Vice President of Common Cause Karen Flynn was flummoxed. “It's
perplexing," said she. "His recommendations save no money, but they
take away the independence of the watchdogs," a chord strummed also by House
Minority Leader Lawrence Cafero: “There's (sic) only two reasons in my opinion. One
is you are trying to save money. That's clearly not the case. The other is
control and power. It has to be the latter."
Since Mr. Cafero has recently expressed interest in running
for governor, it will be easy for Malloyalist operatives to dismiss his ruminations
as political posturing, even when they are reasonable.
As the independence of the three watchdog agencies are drawn
within the orbit of powerful politicians, the real losers will be the crowd of
petitioners, not always news agencies, gathered near the foot of the throne
begging a more powerful and compromised government for simple justice.
Comments
As I understand it, Mr. Guay, the head of the Office of Government Accountability overseeing the "independent" agencies serves at the pleasure of the Governor. The heads of the agencies cannot be fired by the Governor. They serve terms.
Mr. Guay both oversees the nine "independent" agencies under the OGA's umbrella and reports to them; that is, they, in theory, can fire him.
The agencies generate their own budget proposals, but Mr. Guay says he has the right to modify them.
Governor Malloy managed to get a new bureau, but with a very unclear mandate that conflicts with the agencies that it oversees. What's Guay's job? Now Malloy wants to clarify the situation, give Guay authority over the agencies' staffs, make him a standard agency head, and taking to himself the agency budgets. And, for what purpose? Especially with regard to the Ethics and the FOIC guys, we should be concerned about political influence over the independent agencies.
http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.php/archives/entry/who_is_the_boss/
There is some irony here, as you note. The oxen being gored belong to the good-government left, the haters of Nixon and Rowland. The Hartford Courant joined the howlers today. And, his budget has also elicited howls from the State's mayors who suggest that not only does it hurt municipalities, but it is dishonest and deceitful in doing so. I think it fair at this point in our experience of Malloy governance to make a general observation about Malloy's style; it's the style of a litigator.
-------------------------------
A BUDGET BALANCED IN WONDERLAND
By John DeStefano Jr.
“Why, sometimes I’ve believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast.” — Lewis Carroll, “Alice in Wonderland.”
So here are the six impossible things to believe about Connecticut’s proposed state budget.
First, believe that this isn’t the state balancing its budget by raising city and town property taxes.
Second, believe that eliminating the funding for the payments in lieu of taxes on state property is good for our cities, where most of the state’s jobs and buildings are located.
Third, believe the shell game of funding in the budget will really support desperately needed school reform in our state.
Fourth, believe that the car tax is going to just — “poof” — disappear.
Fifth, believe that someone in state government even thought to talk with your mayor or first selectman about any of this.
And finally, believe that there is a plan here to grow jobs in our dismal Connecticut economic landscape.
As is written in “Alice in Wonderland,” “You would have to be half mad to dream me up.” Dream on, Nutmeggers.
In general, the complexity created by our pols is a hazard for their putative masters, we dopes that put them in office. Obamacare is a horrible concoction that is sure to be damaging to the medical/insurance/job markets, and those human beings involved in them, but it might just be that it collapses of its own bureaucratic brain-dead weight even as it tries to get off the ground. The question will be, as with Malloy and his fiscal operations, can Obama successfully pass the blame on to someone else, Republicans or Big Insurance. I'm betting not in both cases because the mess is just going to be so colossal.
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/021513-644723-obamacare-delay-looks-increasingly-likely.htm
----------------------------------
saying that the nonpartisan commissions regarding women, children, aging, Asian Americans, African Americans, and Latinos and Puerto Ricans should remain independent agencies.
http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/hc-malloy-commissions-0220-20130219,0,7114677.story