Skip to main content

Ford: A Discouraging Word

Americans do tend to let their sympathies and myths run away with them. Appearing on the Colin McEnroe show, Nixon gunner and Watergate star Lowell Weicker admitted he was wrong. At the time of then President Gerald Ford’s pardon of Nixon, the senator said, he was outraged. But he was wrong, Weicker generously admitted: Ford was right to pardon Nixon.

Weicker was his usual expansive self:

"Now, let's get to the big issue, which is the pardon of Nixon. I mean, I was pissed when that happened. Obviously, I had passionately involved myself in Watergate. It sort of had taken two years of my life to get out of that difficult time. It turned out alright, but nobody knew that at the beginning. And here comes the president to be pardoned. Well, I made my feelings known in no uncertain terms. But I'm going to tell you... I'm going to do something you rarely hear Lowell Weicker do:I was wrong, he was right. I mean, we had gone through Vietnam; we had gone through Watergate. I mean, the country was just really aflame in every direction. And this man just decided to put the lid on it. We had enough of Watergate. We had done everything that should have been done. The president had resigned. So what do we gotta grind our teeth for a couple of years while we go through the legal process? I don't think so..."

Christopher Hitchens has a different take:

You may choose, if you wish, to parrot the line that Watergate was a ‘long national nightmare,’ but some of us found it rather exhilarating to see a criminal president successfully investigated and exposed and discredited. And we do not think it in the least bit nightmarish that the Constitution says that such a man is not above the law. Ford's ignominious pardon of this felonious thug meant, first, that only the lesser fry had to go to jail. It meant, second, that we still do not even know why the burglars were originally sent into the offices of the Democratic National Committee. In this respect, the famous pardon is not unlike the Warren Commission: another establishment exercise in damage control and pseudo-reassurance (of which Ford was also a member) that actually raised more questions than it answered. The fact is that serious trials and fearless investigations often are the cause of great division, and rightly so. But by the standards of ‘healing’ celebrated this week, one could argue that O.J. Simpson should have been spared indictment lest the vexing questions of race be unleashed to trouble us again, or that the Tower Commission did us all a favor by trying to bury the implications of the Iran-Contra scandal. Fine, if you don't mind living in a banana republic.”

And that ain’t the end of it. There’s more here.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e