Skip to main content

I Seen My Chances…


“I seen my chances, and I took’em” – George Washington Plunkitt

Tom Foley, an announced Republican candidate for governor, dropped an anvil on the multi-footed Connecticut centipede, and -- Ouch!

A bill written by Mr. Foley and launched by State Senator Joe Markley was, according to a story written by Mark Pazniokas in CTMirror, problematic for many members of the part-time state legislature, including a potential GOP rival.”

Mr. Pazniokas is exceptionally well mannered, and “problematic” is his polite way of saying that a bill touching so many careers hasn’t a snowball’s chance in Hell of passing through Connecticut’s version of political Hell.

The potential rival is Republican House Minority leader Larry Cafero, also eyeing the governorship, but the Foley bill would eliminate, in the estimation of state Rep. David K. Labriola, the brother of Republican Party Chairman Jerry Labriola, roughly 500,000 residents from running for public office in Connecticut.

Under the Foley standard, “no public official, state employee or member of their immediate family could be employed by any organization that, among other things, is minimally supported by state funds or employs a lobbyist… anyone who receives $1,000 in income from an entity that derives 5 percent of its income from the state would be in violation of the new standard,” as would members of their immediate families.

The Foley proposal brought Governor Dannel Malloy’s former flack-catcher, Roy Occhigrosso, back to center stage. Mr. Occhiogrosso, who left his employment at Global Strategies to assist a new governor with Connecticut’s media, melted back into the Global Strategies woodwork after a couple of years and now has reemerged briefly as the governor’s chief twitter apologist.

Global Strategies was delighted to have Mr. Occhiogrosso back: ““We are delighted that Roy is rejoining GSG,” said CEO Jon Silvan. “His deep expertise in private and not-for-profit sector communications, combined with his vast experience in government and politics makes him an incredible asset to our team and to our clients.”

Assuming Global Strategies is “an entity that derives 5 percent of its income” in Connecticut, and assuming further that Mr. Occhigrosso has “received more than $1,000” in remuneration from Global Strategies, Mr. Occhiogrosso would not be able under the austere Foley rule to run for office in Connecticut, although he might still be able to divert flak from impeding Mr. Malloy’s forward progress, either on the political stage or from behind the curtain.

The underlying premise of Mr. Foley’s bill is that lobbyists are tar babies that soil the souls of legislators who may write laws benefiting the companies to which the lobbyists are attached. This is a favorite meme, as the progressive bloggers sometimes say, of right thinking leftists, and Republicans are mildly shocked that Mr. Foley has chosen to wield that cudgel against Mr. Cafero, among others, who works for a law firm that does deploy lobbyists. Mr. Cafero’s law firm, as well as many other companies, has erected a sort of Berlin Wall separating lobbying functions from more respectable pursuits. This wall has been under attack for years.


Politicians generally tumble into corruption from inattention, and sometimes they are led off the cliff by their subalterns; former Speaker off the state House Chris Donovan may be a case in point. Law firms are generally circumspect, and Mr. Cafero, who says he has never been the subject of an ethics complaint, is a stickler for detail.

The real problem, of course, is that seemingly endless and complex regulations invite a cozy business relationship between companies and lobbyists that might be mitigated by fewer and less arcane laws and regulations. But cutting away that brush would put out of the lobbying business half the lawyers in Connecticut, not to mention political advisory firms such as Global Strategies. One suspects that Mr. Occhigrosso would manfully resist cleaning the Augean Stables of such detritus because the cleansing would make less marketable “his vast experience in government and politics.”

Comments

peter brush said…
I voted for Foley, and wish he were Gov in stead of D. Malloy. I haven't studied, nor do I intend to study, his proposed conflict-of-interest-elimination program. But, in this move he makes me think of John McCain of campaign-finance-reform fame.
When I contemplate the federal government, its practical and constitutional excesses, funding of political campaigns is pretty far down the list of concerns. Similarly, when I examine the Nutmeg State's problems, whether Tom Ritter makes out as a political fixer is not terribly important.
The pols view their mission as one without any practical limits, and they pursue the mission as if the Nutmeg Constitution were irrelevant. And, at this point, it is plain to see, for anyone with eyes willing to look, that the Democrat Party is running the fiscal ship of State into the ground.
For my money, a candidate for Governor will be attractive in direct proportion to his willingness to say that the State government should be operating within practical and Constitutional limits (gun control?) and to his willingness to confront the State's out of control spending.
Don Pesci said…
Reasonable. Most people probably feel that way.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p