Skip to main content

The Imitation of Trump


Imitation, the wits tell us, is the sincerest form of flattery – when the imitation is sincere. When Democrats repeat in reverse the policies and political rhetoric of President Donald Trump, they come not to flatter Trump, but to bury him.

 

Perhaps the most important question for Democrats right now is: Why has their unabating anti-Trump rhetoric failed so miserably to dethrone Trump in the public’s estimation? We know all the anti-Trump chatter – and the many impeachments, and the many suits, three attempted assassinations and the usual anti-Trump sour-pudding one finds in many of the Associated Press reports -- has not in the least dented Trump’s own estimation of himself.  Most people put this down to his self-celebratory egomania, an offshoot of what they suppose is his tendency towards authoritarianism or Caesarism.

 

Given the 250-year-old republican constitutional order that American Democratic Socialists (ADS) hope to repeal, Caesarism, as it is currently practiced in most socialist/communist countries, does not appear to be a realistic possibility in the United States. Trump will no longer be president after his term ends at high noon Eastern Standard Time on January 20, 2029, and continuity in office is an essential element in tyrannical governance. The Castro brothers have ruled Cuba since 1959, more than six decades of dictatorial rule. Venezuela has been overmastered by a mix of military strongmen, democratic leaders, and Bolivarian socialist presidents from José Antonio Páez in 1830 to Nicolás Maduro, now biding his time in federal pretrial detention at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn, New York, thanks to Trump.

 

At present, no U.S. Gulag has yet been established in New York City to house Trump’s political opponents, and socialist Mayor Zohran Mamdani has showed no interest in springing fellow socialist Maduro.

 

According to generally reliable Nielsen data, the legacy media – major networks and cable both – has taken a deep dive. As of March 2025, legacy broadcasters accounted for just over 10% of total TV viewership. Gallup data shows trust in national news outlets dropping to 40% among Republicans, down from 70% in 2016. According to the New York Times, Trump’s approval rating is hovering around 38% nationally. Alas, the public’s trust in legacy media reporting is hovering around 34%. Trump, whatever his failings, is still more popular than the “Grey Lady” New York Times, the ADS, or brussel sprouts.

 

Trump has been misbehaving for years. Political naughtiness appears to be a permanent part of his public persona. Some commentators have compared him to Huey Long, the infamous and vastly underestimated Louisiana rabble-rouser. The political rabble in New Orleans, considerably less pristine than the political rabble elsewhere in the nation, took to politics the way it took to jazz, warmly embracing a politics that, like jazz, played between the notes. Long was assassinated in the beautiful art deco building he had constructed to keep incumbent Democrat politicians caged in a single Baton Rouge building away from the usual temptations in New Orleans.

 

Trump, full of intimations, has occasionally suggested that comparisons with former president Teddy Roosevelt (TR) might be appropriate.

 

Mark Twain, who could zing with the best of them, was not a Roosevelt fan, or a fan of the U.S. Congress, or a fan of political parties, or fan of a crippling post-Civil War Jim Crow mindset.  Consider the following dictation note taken from the Autobiography of Mark Twain: “Look at the tyranny of party -- at what is called party allegiance, party loyalty -- a snare invented by designing men for selfish purposes -- and which turns voters into chattels, slaves, rabbits, and all the while their masters, and they themselves are shouting rubbish about liberty, independence, freedom of opinion, freedom of speech, honestly unconscious of the fantastic contradiction; and forgetting or ignoring that their fathers and the churches shouted the same blasphemies a generation earlier when they were closing their doors against the hunted slave, beating his handful of humane defenders with Bible texts and billies, and pocketing the insults and licking the shoes of his Southern master.”

 

Twain, everyman’s robust social commentator, heartily disliked TR and skewered him at every opportunity. When TR, following his failed independent run for the presidency on the Bull Moose Progressive ticket, traveled to Africa to shoot water buffalo and other mountable wild animals, Twain   announced that TR had gone to Africa “to shoot cows.” TR said if he found himself alone with Twain, he would hang him.

 

Americans generally tolerate the rough and tumble of politics. In present day America, the voting public has, so to speak, “come of age.” They have left behind their innocent pre-teens years ages ago. The first real American political campaign, the 1800 campaign featuring Thomas Jefferson and John Adams, was not a Sunday stroll through the rose garden. Abe Lincoln was routinely ridiculed by the media that supported his opponent, picturing him occasionally in political cartoons as a black ape.

 

In Trump’s case, reactionary Democrats may have helped in Trump’s presidential election against all three of Trump’s Democrat presidential opponents: Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden and the hapless Kamala Harris.

 

If a resurrected Twain were writing about politics today, he likely would denounce Democrat Party flimflammery and cowardice. A gilded member of the Gilded Age – named after Twain's 1873 novel The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today -- Twain knew how America’s free market system worked in practice. Corporations have never been taxpayers; they were always tax collectors. Every progressive tax levied on every business is collected by the business in the form of higher prices on provided goods and services and passed on to federal and state governments – thereby increasing the cost of goods and services. In what way, a resurrected Twain might ask, does this convoluted process reduce a now burdensome affordability crisis centered on the high prices of necessary goods and services?

 

Absent a Gulag for capitalists in Mamdani’s New York City – perhaps on Wall Street? – we will be stuck with  energized anarchic American Democratic Socialists  and high prices.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...