Roger Sherman -- a Connecticut delegate to The Constitutional Convention and the only founding father who signed all four key U.S. founding documents: the Continental Association, Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution -- proposed on July 16, 1787 a plan of governance that solved a seemingly intractable problem. The larger and smaller states had been engaging in a representational debate that had brought the national Convention to a standstill. The solution to the problem, called at the time The Great Compromise or the Connecticut Compromise, was one of those solutions that really did solve a pressing problem.
The proposal by Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth, also a
delegate to the national convention, answered the question: How should
representation in the new Constitutional national Senate be apportioned among
large and small states?
The large states believed that representation should be
based proportionally on the contribution each state made to the nation’s
finances and defense; the smaller states believed that the only fair plan was
one of equal representation.
The single most important question before the
national delegates gathered to press upon the nation a working constitution, a
form of government, was—who should decide
what should be done? That is the question the delegates assembled to “make
a more perfect union” – to borrow a phrase later deployed by President Abe Lincoln
in a quite different context -- had attempted to answer in their constitution.
Sherman and Ellsworth refused to view the question as an
“either or,” and their proposed resolution of of the standoff between large and
small states was indeed a great compromise. The Connecticut Compromise provided
a dual system of representation: In the House of Representatives each state’s
number of seats would be in proportion to population, while In the Senate all
states would have the same number of seats.
Edmund Randolph of Virginia had proposed a bicameral
legislature of proportional representation in both houses of Congress, a
proposal that satisfied the political ambitions of large states such as
Virginia and New York. William Paterson, a delegate from New Jersey had
proposed a single house legislature for all states to insure equal
representation. Neither side would compromise and the convention was hopelessly
immobilized.
The Sherman-Ellsworth solution envisioned a bicameral
legislature that satisfied a majority of representatives to the convention, and
on July 16, 1787, the Connecticut Compromise was adopted by a one vote
majority.
Just as George Washington is celebrated as “the Father of
his Country” and Samuel Adams, much
underrated, was known even in his own day as “the Father of the American
Revolution,” so Sherman and Ellsworth, both justly celebrated in Connecticut,
should be held up to the nation as “the Fathers of the US Congress,” a building
and institution within sight of the Democrat Party abandoned Connecticut booth
marking the July 4th 250th
anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence on the
National Mall.
All of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Representatives –
including the state’s two U.S. Senators, Dick Blumenthal and Chris Murphy,
neither of whom is camera shy – boycotted the event because President Donald
Trump had arranged the July 4th celebration. These sad-sacks might
have joined in celebration of one or both of the men whose Connecticut
Compromise gave Constitutional shape to the Congress of the United States.
But NOOOO! Anything polluted by the mere touch of the man
they falsely regard as a tyrant – whose term in office will be concluded on
January 20, 2029, not a mark of tyranny – must be regarded as untouchable. And
so the Connecticut booth at the nation’s semi quincentennial celebration
remained unattended by the state’s Democrat Congressional Representatives.
There are no Republican Representatives in the US Congress; the governor’s
office has been the property of Democrats since Governor Jodi Rell retired on
January 5, 2011; and Democrats now have a veto-proof majority in the General
Assembly. If Connecticut government is not a one party tyranny, it most
certainly is a Democrat controlled political hegemony.
Fortunately, the Connecticut booth, occupied by a small band
of patriots, was not left unattended. Here is Connecticut Senator Rob Samson celebration the nation’s 250th birthday
from Connecticut’s repatriated booth: “Hi, I’m State Senator Rob Sampson coming
to you from the Connecticut booth here at the Freedom 250 event in Washington
DC, and I’m here taking the place of our Connecticut coalition that the
Governor of Connecticut was supposed to send down. But in his absence, I and my
colleague Representative Gale Mastrofrancesco have decided to come down and
represent Connecticut for all the people back home,
Republicans, Democrats, Independents, unaffiliated voters. This is bigger than
party affiliation. This is about the birth of our nation and the love of our
country. I am so excited to celebrate America’s 250th birthday. So,
hello to everybody back home.”
Comments