Skip to main content

Murphy on Gaza and Israel


In a minute there is time/ For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse –
T.S. Eliot, “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”

 

Connecticut’s U.S Senator Chris Murphy’s unprincipled references to Israel and Gaza over the years are a meandering mess of warmed over platitudes.

 

The following media citations and stories trace the drift of the platitudes.

 

On October 7, 2023, Murphy issued a Statement on Hamas Attacks on Israel: ““The shocking attacks on Israeli civilians by Hamas terrorists on the 50th anniversary of the Yom Kippur War are unconscionable. The U.S. stands firmly with the Israeli people and supports the government of Israel’s right to defend itself from this horrific violence. Many innocent people on both sides will suffer as a result of Hamas’s orchestrated attacks, which will only cause more chaos and misery. My every thought is with the grieving families and the wounded, and I am continuing to closely monitor developments on the ground.”

 

On October 30, Murphy [cautioned] Israel to show restraint in Gaza, citing lessons of Afghanistan: “The U.S. government is staunchly pro-Israel,” his Connecticut Public Radio host pointed out in a broadcast of “All Things Considered. How then did Murphy see “his role to represent constituents the varied opinions?”

 

Asked by John Henry Smith of Connecticut Public Radio, “How do you and your colleagues walk that fine line [between] a staunchly pro-Israel” American foreign policy that supports “the government of Israel’s right to defend itself from this horrific violence” and Gazans ravaged by war? “With your support of Israel, how do you strike the balance of supporting them while at the same time trying to keep things from escalating [more broadly]?”

 

Murphy responded: “One, we want to support the more moderate Palestinian leadership. So this is a time to get funding into the West Bank to try to stabilize the West Bank to make sure that it doesn't explode. Second, we want to send a deterrent message to Iran and that's why you've seen these carrier battle groups move into the region. Third, we just want to engage in good old fashioned diplomacy. So, you've seen [U.S. Secretary of State Antony] Blinken essentially be in the region non-stop. I have been on the phone with my colleagues in the Middle East, whether it be the Jordanians or the Qataris, trying to send messages about how we can de-escalate in Lebanon … in the West Bank. So, it's an all-above strategy to try to make sure that this conflict stays limited to the conflict in Gaza.”

 

Events unfolded quite differently. Under the leadership of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the war against an assortment of terrorists – Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen, all of them supported and encouraged by Iran – was broadened until the forces set upon the destruction of Israel were militarily degraded. Iran’s nuclear war capability was set back by a precision bombing raid; Hamas was all but destroyed; Syria strongman, the impregnable Bashir Assad, fled his country and sought refuge in Russia; and President Donald Trump methodically persuaded other Islamic nations, most importantly Egypt and Saudi Arabia, to agree to underwrite a peace plan that just might give peace a chance in Israel and Gaza.

 

In November 2024, CTInsider told us, “U.S. Sen. Chris Murphy joined 18 other Senate Democrats on Wednesday in voting to block further sales of American weapons to Israel, citing the mounting number of civilian casualties and questions over the remaining objectives of Israel’s leaders. Three resolutions — each led by Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders — disapproving of arms sales were rejected by the Senate in a series of evening votes, with the majority of Democrats joining Republicans in opposition.”

 

Asked what he would do if the United States and other friendly nations were to withdraw military assistance from Israel, Netanyahu responded that Israel would fight its sworn enemies “with our fingernails.”

 

At long last, having failed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory, “U.S. Senator Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) released a statement regarding the newly announced ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, expressing relief that hostages will be returned and that fighting has ceased. Murphy emphasized the need for a permanent peace and acknowledged the complex issues ahead, including governance of Gaza and security arrangements. He stated, ‘This moment is an important milestone,’ urging all parties to fully implement the ceasefire and work toward a lasting solution that lays the groundwork for a two-state approach and regional normalization.” How does one arrive at a “two-state approach” when one of the “states” is not a state at all but rather a province of Israel, Gaza, housing terrorists supported by Iran pledged to destroy the state of Israel?

 

The above official statement from Murphy’s well trained staff is a prime example of what has been called “damning through faint praise.” In both Israel and Gaza, the exchange of prisoners and the cessation of hostilities, however temporary, have been greeted with immense joy, closed-mouthed Democrat sourpusses in the United State such as Murphy notwithstanding. And among U.S. media hostiles, credit where credit is due has been grudgingly allowed. Even former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton threw a bouquet in Trump’s direction.

 

One supposes that U.S. Senators Dick Blumenthal of Connecticut and Chuck Schumer of New York, both Jews, would allow themselves a moment of bipartisan elation; for Trump’s effective foreign policy in the Middle East was anchored firmly in the policy of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, whose response to terrorist attacks some, this writer included, have compared favorably with Winston Churchill’s exertions during and after what Victor Davis Hanson has called the Second World Wars. The reader will note the plural—“wars.” World War II could not have been won by the United alone. So, too, with the wars – note the plural – in the Middle East. The back of the undeclared Iran-Hamas-Hezbollah- Houthis terrorist coalition was broken finally by a new coalition of the willing brought together by Trump. This new coalition was a masterstroke of diplomacy, made possible by Netanyahu’s well plotted military assault on the enemies of Israel.

 

There is time still for Murphy to bathe himself in the cleansing waters of deliverance.  His current term ends on January 3, 2031, plenty of time for “visions and revisions.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...