Skip to main content

SEBAC and Lamont Win, State Loses

Orwell

In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act
– George Orwell

The state of Connecticut – read: Governor Ned Lamont, a multi-millionaire Democrat, and the state General Assembly, controlled for the past half century by a Democrat majority – have concluded a “deal” with Connecticut’s State Employees Bargaining Agent Coalition (SEBAC), a consortium of public employee unions.

“The Senate gave final approval Friday to a four-year package of raises for state employees that includes $3,500 in bonuses to help stem a surge in worker retirements,” CTMirror reported as a sodden April was giving way to May flowers. “The Democratic-controlled Senate voted 22-13 along party lines to approve the contracts, which cover about 46,000 workers — the bulk of the state’s workforce.”

Speaking for Democrats in the General Assembly, co-chairwoman of the Appropriations Committee Sen. Cathy Osten of Sprague said, intending no irony, “Today we’re living in a post-COVID world, where employees — and not employers — are ruling the job market,” a sentiment that certainly rings true with respect to public employee/General Assembly relations.

So intimate is the decade-long relationship between the dominant Democrat Party in Connecticut and SEBAC, that one commentator – no need to guess who that might be – has  described SEBAC as Connecticut’s fourth branch of government.

The rule among ruling state Democrats is: Whatever SEBAC wants, SEBAC gets.

Generally, SEBAC wants higher taxes to finance ever increasing salary and benefit boosts. And the boosting continues without reference to the state of Connecticut’s economy -- that is to say, without reference to taxpayer’s ability to pay.

It is very much the fashion these days to attribute Connecticut’s foundering economy to COVID, former President Donald Trump, the nation’s dark angel of death and destruction, the Ukrainian war, a struggle that pits an independent Western-reliant country against the remorseless attacks of once and future Soviet leader Vladimir Putin, or any other convenient scapegoat that has made its way onto the political stage.

But the truth is that Connecticut’s economy is the way it is because the state’s political structure is the way it is. Putin did not twist progressive arms in the state’s General Assembly to convince that august body to accumulate a total debt related to retirement costs, bonding and other debt of $79.5 billion. “Connecticut has highest taxpayer debt in the country, according to report,” Connecticut’s Yankee Institute declared in a September 29, 2021 story. The debt leaves each Connecticut taxpayer with an “overall state debt burden of $62,500.”

It is a burden that majority Democrats, in state and nationally, have been content to pass along to future generations who will not be voting in the upcoming 2022 mid-term elections.

Connecticut is full of “lockboxes” that have been unlocked and emptied by spendthrift  politicians content to pass their bills along to the state’s already overburdened progeny, many of whom are choosing to leave the state rather than shoulder an ever-mounting debt.

Some of the escapees, it should surprise no one, are members of SEBAC.

Chris Powell of the Journal Enquirer rightly suspects that behind the inflation producing federal tax hikes and the money “shared” with states lurks a “political racket” that ought to be obvious to those in Connecticut’s media who have not yet fallen prey to political propaganda. It was George Orwell who reminded us that the most difficult chore in journalism is “to see the thing that lies right under our noses.”

“First,” columnist Powell writes in the Journal Inquirer, “the federal government creates vast new amounts of money to enable spending far beyond anything the national economy and even the world economy produce. This devalues the dollar against goods and services, a devaluation people are seeing as record inflation.

“Then the federal government gives some of this new money to the states, which increase their spending and distribute some of the money to their people, as Connecticut has been doing. In their turn people spend the new money but, amid the record inflation, they will be lucky to come close to maintaining their living standards, even as their politicians claim credit for all this largesse as they campaign.”

Powell calls this obvious imposture “bribing the public with their own money.”

If voters in Connecticut are determined to die the good death by tolerating the obvious imposture rather than yielding to the truth that is now bellowing in their ears, the phrase “They were bribed with their own money” might make a fitting collective epitaph.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Casey Chadwick’s Uneasy Life after Death

Casey and her mother Wendy "I just started grief counseling. I'm always sad. I'm sad and in pain and I miss her." Wendy Hartling   Hartling is the mother of Casey Chadwick, murdered in 2015 by Jean Jacques , an illegal Haitian immigrant. Jacques was convicted of the murder of Chadwick in a New London Superior Court jury trial and sentenced by Judge Barbara Bailey Jongbloed to a 60 year term in prison. Since Jacques is 44 years of age, the sentence was, in effect, a life sentence. Connecticut Commentary coverage of the Chadwick murder may be found here , and here   and here . Jacques could not have been sentenced to death because Connecticut’s Democrat dominated General Assembly, under pressure from the state Supreme Court, had abolished Connecticut’s death penalty law in 2012 . The slaughter of Chadwick was particularly brutal. Her body had been found by a friend who, opening a door to a closet, discovered Chadwick stuffed in a dark corner drenched in blo...

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Understanding North Korea Through Dramaturgy

The U.S. military is sending the Vinson Strike Group, including the carrier and two guided-missile destroyers, to operate in the Western Pacific Ocean in response to Pyongyang’s recent missile tests. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, asked about the strike force, issued a terse statement: “The United States has spoken enough about North Korea. We have no further comment.” Is this a post-Syrian bombing mission? Will the US take out North Korea’s missile launching sites, possibly with the unspoken concurrence of China? Never let a bombing go to waste. There are some in the United States who think any such incident should be used to rid North Korea of that runty little totalitarian cock-of-the-walk who keeps his countrymen starved, in fear and at his knees. Since we only have one chance, they say, go for the clean sweep -- no more Kims. Connecticut Commentary is reprinting an earlier piece about the Kims here. Best read with a glass of port.