Skip to main content

The Luxury Of Being Murphy And Blumenthal

Commentators and the general public will have noticed the deep trench, very much like a moat, that separates national and state politics. This severe separation is most evident among a state’s congressional delegation. It is, primarily, an assumed division of labor that demarcates zones of political influence. Only rarely, if at all, do U.S senators and congressmen comment on state politics. It might be interesting, though politically fatal, to hear U.S. Senators Chris Murphy or Dick Blumenthal comment on the present dilapidated state of their state. This will not happen. It very rarely happens that Connecticut’s Washington Beltway senators and congresspersons are asked: “Do you think, as does Governor Dannel Malloy, that Connecticut’s perpetual deficits should be reduced by means other than revenue increases?” Or “About that new ballpark in Hartford – a blessing or a curse?”

The senators and congresspersons in Connecticut’s all-Democratic U.S. Congressional Delegation have bigger fish to fry. In the post-Sandy Hook period, U.S. Senators Murphy and Blumenthal are consumed with preventing the National Rifle Association (NRA) from unduly influencing the U.S. Congress. They are far less interested in preventing state employee unions from unduly influencing Connecticut’s General Assembly.

Others have been elected to guard and oversee Connecticut’s castle. The members of the state’s U.S. Congressional Delegation have larger and, dare it be said? – more important responsibilities. This rigidly observed division of labor rule is waved somewhat during elections, when national politicians return home, full of vim and vigor, to take credit, like Chanticleer, for the rising and setting of the sun. Though Connecticut’s economy is chugging along in last place, the national economy likely will improve under the stewardship – Senators Chuck Schumer and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi permitting – of a resurgent GOP, which in the recently concluded elections captured  the White House and held in its grip both Houses of Congress. Caught between a rock, an irreducible progressive resurgence led by Vermont socialist Bernie Sanders and Wall Street scourge Elizabeth Warren, and a hard place, any rational defense of moderation among Democrats becomes a lonely and thankless pursuit. Mrs. Pelosi, who occasionally finds it necessary to defend capitalism against new-wave progressives, is now being challenged by anti-capitalists smitten with the Bernie bug.

In February 2017, the Observer reports, Mrs. Pelosi “revealed her disdain for progressives, telling a millennial Sanders' supporter who asked if the Democratic Party would embrace Sanders’ populist message: ‘Well, I thank you for your question, but I have to say we’re capitalists—that’s just the way it is.’ Pelosi then embarked on a tone-deaf rant, arguing that the solution was to make billionaires and millionaires more empathetic. ‘We have to change the thinking of people,’ she said. ‘The free market is a place that can do good things.’”

Progressives to Pelosi: Surrender or be besieged. Moderation in the pursuit of progressivism is no virtue; extremism in the pursuit of progressivism is no vice. And never mind that the progressive-socialist experiments in both Venezuela and Connecticut have conspicuously failed. Under a socialist regime, Venezuela has run out of toilet paper; and in Connecticut, under a progressive regime, Mr. Malloy has run out of revenue resources – save for some hedge fund millionaires huddled together in Connecticut’s shrinking “Gold Coast,” whose assets progressives in the General Assembly wish to appropriate, the better to lubricate special interests that reflexively vote Democrat. So plundered, these revenue resources in time will become rare as toilet paper and opposition parties in Venezuela. Even Mr. Malloy, the most progressive state governor since Wilbur Cross, fears that excessive taxation might throw HIS hedge fund managers into the arms of Democratic Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York or Republican Governor Charlie Baker of Massachusetts.

As the feeder streams of Connecticut’s revenue river continue to diminish – the state’s biennial deficit is now approaching (please sit down) $5 billion – the concerns of Mr. Murphy and Mr. Blumenthal seem even more remote from the cares and distresses of their belabored constituents.     

The political lives of Connecticut's seven Congressional Delegation Democrats float like transcendent clouds of unknowing above such parochial state concerns as rising deficits. There are five states that separate Connecticut from the Washington Beltway, buffer enough – and moats are everywhere. The largest moat is a political convention, now a tradition, according to which partisan members of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation are reluctant to comment on the trials and tribulations in their home states.


If President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines rather than Mr. Malloy were the Democratic governor of Connecticut, no commentator in the state would dare approach Mr. Murphy or Mr. Blumenthal with a question concerning Mr. Duterte penchant for cannibalism from fear the governor, in retaliation, would eat their livers. Mr. Malloy is a lame duck, not Hannibal Duarte. And in the case of Connecticut’s U.S. Congressional Delegation, nothing stands between the state’s media and a cleansing interrogatory but a paper thin and pointless tradition.

   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Donna

I am writing this for members of my family, and for others who may be interested.   My twin sister Donna died a few hours ago of stage three lung cancer. The end came quickly and somewhat unexpectedly.   She was preceded in death by Lisa Pesci, my brother’s daughter, a woman of great courage who died still full of years, and my sister’s husband Craig Tobey Senior, who left her at a young age with a great gift: her accomplished son, Craig Tobey Jr.   My sister was a woman of great strength, persistence and humor. To the end, she loved life and those who loved her.   Her son Craig, a mere sapling when his father died, has grown up strong and straight. There is no crookedness in him. Thanks to Donna’s persistence and his own native talents, he graduated from Yale, taught school in Japan, there married Miyuki, a blessing from God. They moved to California – when that state, I may add, was yet full of opportunity – and both began to carve a living for them...

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post , and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...