Skip to main content

UConn To Malloy: It’s Not All Roses and Marigolds After All

The romance between Fred Carstensen of the Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis (CCEA) at UConn and the administration of Governor Dannel Malloy suffered a setback when Mr. Carstensen discovered that new data supplied by the federal government indicates a slowdown in business activity. For reasons that are not clear, the dip in job growth in Connecticut surprised Mr. Carstensen, the Candide of economic analysts in the northeast.



In proving foresight may be vain:  The best laid schemes o' Mice an' Men,  Gang aft agley,  An' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain,  For promis'd joy!

Prior to the passage of a state budget that imposes hefty revenue enhancers on Connecticut’s tax-whipped businesses and its suffering middle class, the CCEA predicted in February that  Connecticut might well add 44,000 jobs in 2015 and 2016. This rosy estimate, Mr. Carstensen now says, was based on federal data that has been massively revised – and not for the better.

Earlier federal data showed strong job creation and output growth in Connecticut, but more recent data concerning the state’s gross state product (GSP)  reduced promising estimates by more than $4 billion; the revised growth figure fell to a lowly 0.6 percent.

Based on the new and more accurate federal figures, CCEA is now reporting that Connecticut ‘s GSP growth in 2014 lags behind that of Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Ohio and – adding insult to injury – “even Rhode Island.” The slowdown in business activity in Connecticut means that job creation in Connecticut during the next two years “will likely stall and may even now decline,” according to the revised CCEA report.

One policy in particular, the hospital tax, is especially onerous, Mr. Carstensen tardily advises.

In fiscal year 2011-2012, Connecticut imposed a $350 million annual tax on its hospitals, returning $400 million in state grants to the industry, a budget maneuver that allowed Connecticut to qualify, under Medicaid rules,” for a 50 percent federal reimbursement on its payments, or $200 million,” according to a report in CTMirror  .

In order to accommodate persistent budget deficits, the Malloy administration and the Democrat dominated General Assembly steadily reduced its give-back amount to hospitals – but, significantly, the hospital tax remained constant. Reimbursement rates rose, state grants to hospitals were reduced and, predictably, the state forfeited its federal aid. This year, CTMirror reports, “will get back less than $96 million, and the state will receive about $65 million in aid – about $200 million less than it would have had payments to hospitals remained at 2011 levels.”

If Robert Burns, the author of “To A Mouse,” had been in charge of UConn’s Connecticut Center for Economic Analysis, the Center’s job growth predictions might have been more accurate:

But Mousie, thou are no thy-lane, 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...