Skip to main content

Primaries and General Elections, Democrat Radicals Eating Their Own

 Mamdani

For those unfamiliar with politics in the good old USA, it may be necessary to point out the difference between a primary and a general election.  A general election is a cross party struggle, and a primary is an interior party struggle.

 

Democrat Party partisans in New York City are still celebrating their victories in the New York City primary race, and they hope to extend their forward momentum beyond New York. It has been rumored that socialist squad leader Alexandria Cassio Cortez (AOC) has her eye on Chuck Schumer’s U.S. Senate seat. AOC has yet to issue a categorical denial that Schumer may be the next target of ambitious New York socialists and Schumer, for his part, has most recently dressed himself up in the usual socialist rhetorical apparel. Hey Schumer, Pelosi, Blumenthal – you’re next.

 

The same is true in Connecticut, where long-serving U.S. House member John Larson finds himself under primary assault from young anti-establishment Democrats. The forces arrayed against the aged Larson are wide in scope.

 

Luke Bronin was a successful mayor of Connecticut’s capital city, Hartford, highly dependent on the Democrat dominated legislature for occasional bailouts. The city is thought to be tax poor, a status that has not occasioned reasonable budget cuts to align its spending with its tax resources. The Democrat Party in Connecticut tends to treat budget cuts as electrified third rails, even though it is common knowledge in the business world that you can cut ten percent of anything without greatly disturbing the delicate balance of economic forces. Political forces – most especially the state’s public employee union heads – can be touchy about cuts or a momentary pause in Connecticut’s largely automatic public employee spending increases.

 

Bronin, most state reporters and commentators would agree, is not a fiery-eyed leftist. His campaign against Larson thus far has been polite and rational. Bronin is no New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani. The political gravitational pull of Mamdani is illustrated by the recent primary victories of two Mamdani endorsed candidates: Brad Lander and Darializa Avila Chevalier.

 

This is an intra-political struggle among Democrat Party primary socialists. The Washington Examiner correctly notes: The two notable losses in Tuesday’s Democratic primaries were Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman, who both lost to candidates endorsed by New York City’s socialist mayor, Zohran Mamdani. Espaillat is a beneficiary of the racial politics hierarchy Democrats have built over the past two decades as the chairman of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, but was pushed out by the rich, white Democrats in his district who preferred his opponent, Darializa Avila Chevalier, who wants to erase police, prisons, private property, and Israel from existence… Goldman, meanwhile, cut his teeth as a top Trump hater in the Democratic caucus. Goldman was the lead counsel in Trump’s first impeachment, has repeatedly called Trump a fascist dictator, and said that ‘he has to be eliminated.’ His fervent anti-Trump positions earned him no goodwill among his Democratic base, leading him to be harassed for being a Jewish Democrat who doesn’t hate Israel and soundly defeated by New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who has made himself a token in the movement as a Jewish Democrat who peddles falsehoods about the ‘genocide’ in Gaza.

 

The intraparty battle in New York City has replaced coy hidden socialists with boisterous socialists whose primary  (pun intended) intentions are written plainly in Mamdani’s smiley face: to eradicate bashful, reticent socialism and replace in general elections ancient liberal party adherents with young, energetic, committed socialist/communist agitators born with knives in their brains and ideological steel in their spines. The Mamdani wrecking crew has ambitions that extend far beyond New York City.

                                                                                                                                    

The playground and testing ground for ardent socialists like Mamdani is any large city or geographic area in the United States that has long been dominated by Democrat single-party power politics. All of New England, New York and California would seem to fit the bill. This revolutionary overthrow of left of center liberal Democrat politicians such as, to mention one of many, U.S. Senator Chuck Schumer of New York can only occur with the cowardly acquiescence of the remaining aged liberals the socialists hope to displace.

 

“Espaillat and Goldman,” the Washington Examiner points out, “thought they had built themselves the credentials needed to last in the Democratic Party through racial politics and Trump-hatred, but they were wrong. Lander allied himself with Mamdani, while Avila Chevalier is a personification of the most insane left-wing opinions you could find in an elected official. They are both representatives of Mamdani’s movement, which whitewashes the acts of Islamic terrorists and promotes communist redistributionism.”

 

Connecticut is not yet New York but, together with other New England states, “The Land of Steady Habits,” now a Democrat Party monolith, has been moving left for several decades, and the endpoint of the journey leftward appears to be the socialist/communist construct in New York City and other places in Democrat Party dominated blue states whose center-left Democrat politicians are especially vulnerable in Democrat Party primaries, the proving grounds of progressive/communist true believers such as Mamdani. By nurturing rather than denouncing far left destructive ideologies, so called “moderate” Democrats have been raising foxes in the bosom of their own party. 

 

The left-most candidate for governor in Connecticut is Josh Elliot, a District 88 State House of Representative member of the Democrat Party since 2016. He is said to be a shrewd and vigorous campaigner who may make a respectable showing in his primary against sitting Governor Ned Lamont – or not.

 

No one has yet asked Elliot the all-important question: Do you plan to join the demolition efforts of radical socialist New York leftists by changing the ideological makeup of primary challengers from the liberal orientation of, say, former President John Kennedy to that of Zorhan Mamdani, Brad Lander and Darializa Avila Chevalier?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

  Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.   In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.   The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."   "Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.   “No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. Th...