Skip to main content

Malloy, A Plagiarist In Effect

Connecticut commentators were shocked – SHOCKED! – to find that Grover Norquist, founder and president of Americans for Tax Reform, an organization that opposes all tax increases, and Governor Dannel Malloy, a progressive, though less progressive than Socialist Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont or progressive love-child Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, should both agree that minor drug use should not be criminalized.

Mr. Norquist objects to mandatory sentencing for minor drug use because he rightly believes that sentencing should be a judicial rather than a legislative function.

Bill Buckley, considered by some to have midwifed the modern conservative movement, thought the same and proposed that drug use should be decriminalized.




Mr. Buckley here and elsewhere had stressed the following points concerning the criminalization of drug use: 1) drug prosecution is an expensive proposition with a very disappointing return; 2) prosecution does not attack the problem of addiction at its source, 3) prisons have become overcrowded schools where drug users quickly learn how to become drug distributors, and 4) the war on drugs – through the prosecution of low level drug crimes – has resulted in an increase of criminal activity that has had a ruinous effect on black family formation.

The Cato Institute, perhaps the most influential conservative think tank then and now, also took up the cause of drug de-criminalization. All this happened, it should be noted, way back in 1996, when Dannel Malloy, then still wet behind his political ears, had been serving as Mayor of Stamford for little more than half a year.

So then, it should surprise no one that Mr. Norquist has championed a cause previously embraced by Mr. Buckley. It is a little surprising that Mr. Malloy, the mayor of a city in which Mr. Buckley resided for years, should not early on in his political career have been familiar with conservative thought on drug use. In fact, it would be only a slight exaggeration to say that Mr. Malloy has now jumped, eagerly but belatedly, on Mr. Buckley’s bandwagon.

Better late than never.

Mr. Malloy has charged moderate Republicans in Connecticut’s General Assembly with effective racism. Mr. Malloy has conceded that Republican opposition to his program, which would free low level drug users of prosecution, is not intentionally racist. However, those who oppose the adjustment of a law that is racist in effect are themselves effective racists.

Mr. Malloy’s tinkering with decriminalization – he would only repeal the provision in the law that enforces prosecution for minor drug use – is far less comprehensive than Mr. Buckley’s proposition, which would abolish the criminalization of drug use altogether and provide medical relief, rather than prison, for drug addiction. More timid than Mr. Buckley's, Mr. Malloy's solution to the problem leaves the entire drug punishing apparatus -- the lawyers, the judges, the prosecutors and unionized prison workers -- still in place. Why overthrow such a money making operation? Mr. Buckley's solution sweeps all this away and recognizes the utter uselessness of a justice system that punishes addiction with prison rather than medical care. 

Mr. Malloy easily could have rounded up Republican support for the program he is now loudly touting; conservatives had tilled the ground he was plowing twenty years earlier. Instead, he chose to pull the pin on a “racist” hand grenade and lob it in the direction of Republicans in the General Assembly. His motive in doing so was entirely political, a bid to paint Republicans as racists and so capture in future elections the votes of the vast majority in Connecticut who abhor racism. Mr. Malloy’s understanding of Republicans and conservatives is primitive but politically useful to him.

The notion that a program is not racist in intent but racist in effect is an old reliable rhetorical bean bag of the left. But it should not escape notice that legislators rather than governors make laws; that the lawmaking body in Connecticut has been dominated by Democrats since the 1963 and 1965 sessions, the last time Connecticut's Senate and House had majorities of different political parties, and that drug laws in Connecticut – now deemed excessive by Mr. Malloy, long after they were deemed excessive by conservatives – have been affirmed by majority Democrats, who must be, according to Mr. Malloy’s twisted logic, effective racists.


Mr. Malloy owes a heartfelt apology to the Republicans he has defamed unjustly. And if he repents properly – offering a sincere confession and a pledge to go and sin no more --  merciful conservatives in the state should forgo prosecuting the progressive porcupine for rank political plagiarism. Mr. Malloy, of course, is not a political plagiarist through intent. He stumbled into it though blind and politically purposeful ignorance.

Comments

peter brush said…
Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont
-----------------
Speaking as someone whose entire family was of Vermont, I wouldn't want to be mean spirited by pointing out that Bernie is more of New York City than of Ludlow or Barton. Nor by noting that he has no Vermont family, and wasn't even "educated" in Vermont. That's not the alienation pertinent here. Regardless of our thinking on legalization of drugs, pro or con, we should agree that it isn't a matter of concern for United States Senator Bernard Sanders nor for Dem-Socialist Bernie Sanders, candidate for the District of Columbia's Idi Amin Executive Chair. Domestic drug use is not a federal issue under that pesky U.S. Constitution, but precisely the sort of crime that should be identified and managed right here in the Sovereign Nutmeg State.

Dannel Malloy may be more intelligent than he acts, but he's not well educated. I wouldn't be surprised if he's never heard of WFB. The sort of thought control the Left has been imposing on universities for the past three decades has had an effect on the Left itself. Todd Gitlin, of the Students for a Democratic Society and Columbia U., recently complained that students are now unwilling to be properly shocked and disturbed. Malloy and the Left are now effectively stupid, because they're unwilling to open their eyes to facts or engage in honest open deliberation. Malloy is not a libertarian, rather, for him the drug issue is of concern because of his racialist egalitarianism. I wish the leadership of the Alienated Black Guys would endorse school vouchers. Then Dan could get out from under his illegally segregated school operation.
------------
Bernie Sanders was born on September 8, 1941, in Brooklyn, New York, the son of Eli and Dorothy (Glassberg) Sanders.[15][16] His father was a Jewish immigrant from Poland; most of his family was killed during the Holocaust.[17] His mother was born to Jewish parents in New York.[18][19] He graduated from James Madison High School in Brooklyn, where he had competed on his school's track team.[20][21]

Sanders spent his freshman year studying psychology at Brooklyn College, then transferred to the University of Chicago.[22] While there, he was active in the Civil Rights Movement, and a student organizer for the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.[23]
----------------
Obama obviously is in no hurry, despite the fact that the government arrests 700,000 or so marijuana offenders each year and currently imprisons some 40,000 for daring to grow a plant or distribute its produce. "I always say to folks who support legalization or decriminalization that it's not a panacea," he says. In case you were wondering, legalization also is not a "silver bullet." But is it better than the alternative? Although Obama seems to think so, he is not willing to say the words.

The president is more comfortable criticizing "disproportionate prison sentences." He says "our criminal justice system" is "skewed towards cracking down on nonviolent drug offenders," which has "a terrible effect on many communities, particularly communities of color, rendering a lot of folks unemployable, because they [have] felony records." While "substance abuse...is a problem," Obama says, "locking someone up for 20 years is probably not the best strategy." He adds that he is "encouraged" that "you're starting to see not just liberal Democrats but also some very conservative Republicans recognize this doesn't make sense, including the libertarian wing of the Republican Party."

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p