Skip to main content

Blumenthal Biden his Time

Blumenthal

There is little doubt that Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal has been emotionally affected by his recent visit to Poland, where he saw writ large at first hand the ravages of Russian imperialist Vladimir Putin’s policy towards Ukraine, NATO, the United States and democracy. About a third of Ukrainians have fled Putin’s assaults on major Ukrainian cities, many of them ending up in Poland.

Blumenthal well understands Putin’s unjustifiable attacks on a sovereign country that has served since the Soviet Union recession as a buffer between Russia and Eastern Europe.

Strategically, Putin wants to crush Ukrainian independence, move Russia’s border westward, so that it is contiguous with the borders of NATO states, put Ukraine permanently at the mercy of Russia by annexing the Donbas region, as Russia had earlier annexed Crimea, providing a land bridge from Russia to Crimea. Both Blumenthal and Biden are familiar with Putin’s strategic war aims. So are nearly all Democrats and Republicans, as well as Pentagon chieftains.

Early in April, the Senate Armed Services Committee grilled both Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Mark Milley.

“Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, the Hill reported, “was the most vocal of several Democrats on the panel urging the Pentagon to step up its support for Ukraine’s war effort. 

“It seems to me that often our strategy seems somewhat schizophrenic," Blumenthal said. "We want the Ukrainians to defeat the Russians, but we're afraid that pushing Putin into defeat may provoke escalation. It seems to me that we need to address those fears and realistically provide the Ukrainians what they need to win."

Blumenthal earlier had said that the United States should be supplying adequate weapons to Ukraine – including forbidden planes that would allow Ukraine to regain control of its skies which, everyone in the military knows, is necessary if the friends of the United States and NATO were to win a ground war. Blumenthal is a Marine.

Republican U. S. Senator Tom Cotton of Arkansas, the Hill reported, “elicited from Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III the admission that, up until now, the Pentagon has not clearly stated that the U.S. military could provide battlefield information to Ukraine’s forces that could help them fight Russian proxies in the separatist-controlled eastern Donbas region of Ukraine.”

Why couldn’t the Pentagon provide Ukraine with naval assets, Blumenthal asked, “or send American A-10 attack planes that the Pentagon is in the process of retiring. He also wondered aloud whether America cannot train Ukrainian troops so they can operate more U.S.-made equipment. He wondered why the administration has not invoked Defense Production Act authorities to accelerate weapons procurements.”

It was Blumenthal’s finest hour… well, perhaps his finest 15 minutes of fame, and U.S. Senator Tom Cotton, who serves with Blumenthal on the Senate Armed Services Committee, justly complimented Blumenthal.

But Blumenthal’s pointed question – is the State Department and the Pentagon interested in WINNING a military contest against Putin? – might easily be asked of President Joe Biden, the nominal head of the national Democrat Party. Does Biden want to WIN the war in Ukraine?

Praise of Ukrainian courage has become a form of cheap grace among administration and Defense Department officials. Training Ukrainians in the use of new weaponry, Austin said, “would take Ukrainian fighters out of the ‘knife fight’ they are in. And he expressed doubt that A-10s Blumenthal mentioned “could survive attacks in Ukraine. He reiterated, too, that the administration is pushing U.S. defense contractors as hard as possible to turn out more weapons for Ukraine and to backfill U.S. stocks that the Pentagon has drawn down to support the war.”

Owing to an abundance of caution on the part of the Biden administration and its Pentagon advisors, Ukraine has been in a “knife fight” with an acquisitive  enemy that has had complete control of the skies over Ukraine from the very first Russian aggression. That IS the problem. The U.S. and its allies are asking Ukrainians to continue a “knife fight” with Putin, who has brought a gun to the fight and has reduced to dust numerous Ukrainian cities, including Mariupol, the gateway to the Donbas region Putin hopes to add to Russian acquisitions.  

Over the weekend, Austin and U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken paid a visit to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The meeting on Sunday, according to an Associated Press report, “took place as Ukrainians and Russians observed orthodox Easter, when the faithful celebrate the resurrection of Jesus. Speaking from Kyiv’s ancient St. Sophia Cathedral, Zelenskyy, who is Jewish, highlighted its significance to a nation wracked by war.

“The great holiday today gives us great hope and unwavering faith that light will overcome darkness, good will overcome evil, life will overcome death, and therefor Ukraine will surely win.”

Milley is not hopeful. Ukrainians, he said, have “managed to defeat the Russian onslaught onto Kyiv. But there is a significant battle yet ahead down in the southeast, down around the Donbas region, where the Russians intend to mass forces and continue their assault. So I think it's an open question right now how this ends.”

Comments

Unknown said…
Coming from a man who has access to a bomb shelter. Russia will win in the end and this will all have been for nothing. If they don’t win they will always be a threat to Ukraine and what then? Will we be in this war forever defending Ukraine? Personally I think this is just one big money laundering operation by NATO and the Biden crime syndicate

Popular posts from this blog

The Murphy Thingy

It’s the New York Post, and so there are pictures. One shows Connecticut Senator Chris Murphy canoodling with “Courier Newsroom publisher Tara McGowan, 39, last Monday by the bar at the Red Hen, located just one mile north of Capitol Hill.”   The canoodle occurred one day or night prior to Murphy’s well-advertised absence from President Donald Trump’s recent Joint Address to Congress.   Murphy has said attendance at what was essentially a “campaign rally” involving the whole U.S. Congress – though Democrat congresspersons signaled their displeasure at the event by stonily sitting on their hands during the applause lines – was inconsistent with his dignity as a significant part of the permanent opposition to Trump.   Reaching for his moral Glock Murphy recently told the Hartford Courant that Democrat Party opposition to President Donald Trump should be unrelenting and unforgiving: “I think people won’t trust you if you run a campaign saying that if Donald Trump is ...

The PURA soap opera continues in Connecticut: Business eyeing the exit signs

The trouble at PURA and the two energy companies it oversees began – ages ago, it now seems – with the elevation of Marissa Gillett to the chairpersonship of Connecticut’s Public Utilities Regulation Authority.   Connecticut Commentary has previously weighed in on the controversy: PURA Pulls The Plug on November 20, 2019; The High Cost of Energy, Three Strikes and You’re Out? on December 21, 2024; PURA Head Butts the Economic Marketplace on January 3, 2025; Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA on February 3, 2025; and Lamont’s Pillow Talk on February 22, 2025:   The melodrama full of pratfalls continues to unfold awkwardly.   It should come as no surprise that Gillett has changed the nature and practice of the state agency. She has targeted two of Connecticut’s energy facilitators – Eversource and Avangrid -- as having in the past overcharged the state for services rendered. Thanks to the Democrat controlled General Assembly, Connecticut is no l...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...