Skip to main content

Is Connecticut Losing Its Sovereignty?


States' rights under a federated system still mean something – except when they mean nothing to the reigning power.

Britain, by withdrawing from the European Union (EU), has just provided to the free world’s democratic remnant a valuable lesson in sovereignty. Among other reasons the “Leave” party in Britain was anxious to dissever the ties that bound it to the EU was a loss of decision-making power, the leeching of sovereignty from Britain to Brussels, where matters of national import were decided by EU bureaucrats fortified against a democratic voting process to which the government of Britain had since the “Glorious Revolution” of 1688, which led through Britain’s 1689 Bill of Rights to a Parliamentary ascendancy, willingly bent its knees.

Within the EU, borders were less than red lines, and questions that had been decided pre-union by individual nations were, post-union, framed by EU exigencies. When Greece, a member of the EU, predictably went broke, the country was bailed out by more responsible nations. When a failed Western foreign policy, the product of agreement between the EU and a lead-from-behind US President, produced an indigestible crop of unprocessed – and perhaps unassimilable  – illegal immigrants, borders became terms of art, as nations were muscled by the European Union to accept a massive influx of war-torn migrants, some of whom had pledged their fealty to ISIS overlords. That fealty has been written in blood in the streets of Paris and in terror attacks inspired by ISISmost recently in Orlando, Florida and Turkey.

Connecticut, under the governorship of Dannel Malloy, has been very good to the Barack Obama administration.  Connecticut was, to cite only two examples, one of the first states in the union that warmly embraced what has come to be called Obamacare. Under the Malloy administration, Connecticut adopted stringent gun regulations that all the members of the state’s all-Democratic U.S. Congressional Delegation believe should become a national template. Following an attack by a militant Islamic follower of ISIS on an Orlando, Florida gay club, the Democratic members of Connecticut’s Delegation arranged to shut down profitable discussions concerning possible gun regulations and then engaged in a 1960’ “sit-in” to grab headlines and provide the Democratic Party with campaign donations.

In return for Mr. Malloy’s fealty, the Obama administration has graced the state with certain favors. If there is any politician in Connecticut who does not yet know that the state’s recurring budget deficits have been caused by high taxes, excessive regulations,  business flight and the replacement of high salary earners by lower paid workers, he or she has been hiding behind flower pots for the past five years of the Malloy administration. Mr. Malloy has many times announced firmly that there will be no more tax increases, a pre-campaign pledge followed by both the largest and the second largest tax increases in Connecticut's history.

We know that elections follow campaigns and, once politicians who play loose with their promises are safely returned to office, campaign pledges are quickly shelved in favor of politics as usual. Who does not remember former Governor John Rowland's campaign promise to repeal the Lowell Weicker income tax should voters have the good sense to elect Mr. Rowland Governor? Who does not remember Mr. Malloy’s campaign pledge, at the end of his first term, to eschew further tax increases? That pledge was followed, once Mr. Malloy had been re-installed as Governor, with the second highest tax increase in Connecticut’s history.

Mr. Malloy’s approval rating has now, he hopes, bottomed out at 24 percent, a suitable badge of courage for the governor of a state whose citizens are among the highest taxed in the nation. What a fix: Deficits recur with alarming regularity, and Mr. Malloy has promised on a stack of Bibles several times -- no more tax increases.

Ah… but… Enter the Obama administration, with a nifty “pilot program.” Gas prices in the nation have plummeted in response to increased supplies – thanks fracking! -- and an economic strategy pursued by oil rich Saudi Arabia. The drop in the price of oil and Hugo Chavez’s brand of Latin American socialism is responsible in Venezuela, a country that sits atop the largest oil reserves in the world, for the absence of toilet paper and food. Here in Connecticut, plummeting gas prices have trimmed tax receipts.

Mr. Obama’s “pilot program,” which would tax miles traveled, will provide a desperate Malloy administration with a saving buoy.

Senate Minority Leader Len Fasano got it exactly right:  “They’re going to wait until after the election, have this hocus pocus study and then come with this vehicle mileage tax which is going to increase the cost for everybody in the state of Connecticut.”

Ah… but… rejoined spending-cut averse Democrats such as co-chair of the legislature’s Transportation Committee Representative Tony Guererra, “We have to throw these ideas out there. Whether we’re going to use this is probably, you know, far reaching right now.” The operative words in that sentence are “probably” and “right now.” After the election period has passed, revenue hungry Democrats will raise taxes. It’s what Democrats do – but not right now. In the post-election period, revenue hungry Democrats will boost taxes yet again– unless they are effectively rebuked by a politically and morally awakened voting public.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Donna

I am writing this for members of my family, and for others who may be interested.   My twin sister Donna died a few hours ago of stage three lung cancer. The end came quickly and somewhat unexpectedly.   She was preceded in death by Lisa Pesci, my brother’s daughter, a woman of great courage who died still full of years, and my sister’s husband Craig Tobey Senior, who left her at a young age with a great gift: her accomplished son, Craig Tobey Jr.   My sister was a woman of great strength, persistence and humor. To the end, she loved life and those who loved her.   Her son Craig, a mere sapling when his father died, has grown up strong and straight. There is no crookedness in him. Thanks to Donna’s persistence and his own native talents, he graduated from Yale, taught school in Japan, there married Miyuki, a blessing from God. They moved to California – when that state, I may add, was yet full of opportunity – and both began to carve a living for them...

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...