Skip to main content

Colin McEnroe’s Dreams

It’s a little soon for all this. Still, as Hartford Courant humorist Colin McEnroe says, one can always dream:

“But it's intriguing to dream of a Lieberman reconciliation. [Difficult as it is to believe from what follows, Mr. McEnroe is envisioning reconciliation between Mr. Lieberman and himself] Even though I have known him longer and better than most of you and had uneasily noticed — before most people did — the slow, Gollum-like warping of his politics and his personality, I miss the Joe Lieberman you could talk to without feeling the need to be accompanied by an exorcist.

“It would a wonderful thing if he returned to Connecticut and announced he will not seek re-election in 2012. We would probably need that in writing. Notarized. Then he could give a series of interviews in which he discussed, thoughtfully and in a healing manner, the fascinating choices that led to his recent 25 and 30 percent approval ratings. The 2011 Joe Lieberman "Hug It Out Tour." You know you want it.

“That is probably not going to happen because locating the unassuming, reflective person living under all those layers of Lieberman vanity and ambition is an extraction process that makes the Chilean miners rescue look like a single afternoon of leaf-raking.

“Instead, I believe that Lieberman will circle Connecticut's political landscape like a wolf waiting for a campfire to die down. The Democrats will not nominate him. "Connecticut for Lieberman," the party he founded but neglected to join, was boarded by pirates who sailed it around and crashed it into the rocks last Election Day, when it failed to get 1 percent of the vote and thus lost its ballot position.”

Other boiling cauldrons of satire, not all of them Courant commentators, surely will erupt as Lieberman contemplates his future in Connecticut politics. Mr. Lieberman has become the Sarah Palin of Democratic progressives in the state and was, at one point in his career, unfortunate enough to endorse as president Mrs. Palin’s running mate, Republican Sen. John McCain,

For the most part, Mr. Lieberman always has and still does vote with the now dwindling Democratic majority.

Since Mr. Lieberman has gone to some trouble to advertise himself as an Independent, he likely will run as an Independent. And if he does not run, progressive Democrats and others will hop on Rep. Chris Murphy’s bandwagon. Mr. McEnroe will be among others leading the parade unless like Hamlet, thinking himself bounded in a walnut shell, he has bad dreams.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Taking The Fifth, After Esty

Whether or not U.S. Representative Elizabeth Esty will serve the remainder of her term or resign immediately is very much an open question. But, in any case, the battle for Connecticut’s 5 th U.S. Congressional District has begun with a show of unexpected fireworks. For many years, the 5 th District was a toss-up proposition; both Republicans and Democrats have held and surrendered the seat. Geographically the 5 th District touches the border of New York from Connecticut’s northern-most point to Danbury in the southern quadrant and includes much of Litchfield county and parts of Fairfield, Hartford and New Haven counties. Party affiliation is competitive, in round figures, 30 percent Democrat, 25 percent Republican and 45 percent unaffiliated. Over the years, the Democrat Party in Connecticut has moved from the center to the left, but the 5 th District has been a moderate preserve. During the Obama presidential election, Republican moderates within Connecticut's U.S. ...

PCBs, GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

By Gerald and Natalie Sirkin c2007 A front-page story on PCBs in the March 9 News-Times is just wrong. The first thing to know about PCBs is that they never killed a single person nor did they ever cause cancer. The second is that although they are invariably called “cancer-causing,” that designation comes chiefly from a single rat study. The third thing is that the subject rats were exposed daily for 21 months to 100 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs containing 60% chlorine. (The 100 ppm was about 5,000 times the tolerable daily intake of PCBs set by FDA in 1973.) When rats were exposed to PCBs containing less chlorine, they developed no cancers. The fourth, that when the exposed rats were allowed to live out their lives, they had fewer cancers and lived longer than the unexposed rats. PCBs is a family of chemicals known as polychlorinated biphenyls. PCBs contain chlorine ranging from 12% to 70%. They were used in two General Electric plants that manufactured electrical equipmen...