Skip to main content

George Ricco


Somewhere, Fyodor Dostoyevsky says the average life of a man is about three generations; that would be around 180 years.

Why so long?

Well, a man lives in the lives of his family, children and friends. The problem of death – real death, in the sense of obliteration and forgetfulness – begins after the third generation. By the fourth generation, a man is forgotten. Life has lost its grip on the human imagination, and the man is gone, utterly gone, at least on this side of death’s veil. For Christians who believe in the promises of the Living God, death is swallowed up in life everlasting. But not all of us have the courage – or the imagination -- to believe such things.

I knew George. I still carry him around in my memory. His brother Ernie included in his memorial of his brother a picture of George (see above) when both of them were very young. A couple of days ago, I mentioned in a phone conversation with Ernie the picture he had included, showing George at, I would guess, about eight years old.  This is the George of my own young years, relatively speaking (pun intended).

Andree and I were not married long and living in Bethel – which means, gloriously, “the house of God” – when the two Ricco boys used to visit us. And this was a picture from that time. It was a time when no memorialization was needed. The whole world was full of family. My own family – very large, including my brother and sister, loads of uncles, aunts and cousins – was bursting at the seams. When you can visit someone and knock on the door of their hearts, there is no need of memory. They are THERE. It is presence, the presence of real loving people, that puts memory in the back seat. Here were the real George and the real Ernie.

On viewing the picture of George, I told Ernie, “You know, at that age, George was much handsomer than you.” He took it all in good humor. I can tell you this about George then: His heart was pure. When we die, God will not judge us by our resumes. God judges the human heart. He looks deeply into our souls and says, all of us hope, “OK. You’re in.”

George is in.

How do I know this? Purity of heart does not look to the future. It is mindful of the present, of the person under its nose. And it brushes away all extraneous detail. The human heart is a hunter looking for love. When it finds it, it rejoices. The human heart suffers, sometimes from calamities it brings upon itself. But the human heart that will unscroll before God on the last day knows, with every fiber of its being, that suffering is not useless. How can it be when we will be received on the last day by a God whose Son was lifted up on a cross of pain and suffering? -- “And I, if I be lifted up, will draw all men to myself.”

What do we think it means “to be lifted up?” Christ, who suffered and died for us, was not lifted up to Heaven -- here capitalized because it is a REAL place name – on a golden throne, but on a rude cross stained with blood. Do any of us think He would shut the door on one of His suffering lambs?

No – George is in.

How do I know this?

“In the end, you die,” Blaise Pascal said. “And they throw a little dirt on you, and everyone walks away. But there is One who will not walk away.”

You either believe that or not. By our beliefs, we participate in the creation of Heaven and Hell – and not in some distant land of fairy, but here and now. It pleases George's aunt and uncle to believe that George is now surrounded by Love -- because that is what he deserves. He deserved it when Andree and I knew him all those years ago in the house of God, in Bethel. He deserves it now. And on Saturday, July 25, his family and close friends with gather together to remember him.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p