Skip to main content

Connecting Connecticut’s Dots


The deficit is back. Like an aging coquette, it appears and disappears around corners, smiling fetchingly at us: Here today, gone tomorrow, back again the next day.

It appears that the skeletons came out of the closet a few days after Governor Dannel Malloy, the seven members of  Connecticut’s all Democratic U.S. Congressional Delegation, members of the all-Democratic State Constitutional Offices and Democrat legislators who dominate the General Assembly were returned to office. Faced with an “unexpected” state deficit, Ben Barnes, the Head of Governor Malloy's Office of Policy Management, said that Connecticut should perhaps expect chronic deficits in the future, a thunderclap that caught the notice of some papers.

Mr. Barnes may have been mistaken by some, if only for a moment, for Jonathan Gruber, an MIT Don dripping with ivy and one of the architects of President Barack Obama’s Health Care initiative. Mr. Gruber is on record as having said in various venues that Obamacare was intentionally deceiving -- necessarily so because most Americans, who are far less bright than MIT professors, would have rejected Obamacare had its architects been more honest than either Gruber or Obama.

It’s true that Henry Mencken once said no one ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people, but one expects that sort of thing from a scourge of democracy. One expects genuflections in the direction of all things democratic from office holders, particularly Presidents and their Ivy League factotums. Mr. Gruber is to be congratulated for blurting out the truth about Obamacare. In a like manner, Barnes blurted out the truth about Connecticut’s budgets when he said Connecticut’s deficits had become chronic. They are chronic for the most part because governors and legislators past and present have not cut spending sufficiently.

Days after the elections, some voters may be asking themselves whether there should be a price to pay for naked campaign fraudulence. Malloy said no, there would be no deficits, and now we have a deficit in the current fiscal year approaching $100 million, perhaps more, according to Republicans. Further down the road, the state is confronting a deficit of about $2.8 billion for the next biennial budget. Only 42.3 percent of The State Employees' Retirement System (SERS) was funded as of 2012 and 58 percent was unfunded.  An 80 percent funded, 20 percent unfunded ratio is considered healthy; Connecticut is one of only nine states that have a ratio of less than 60 percent. The state’s long term debt, at around $65 billion, is daunting.

If justice and truth were in perfect alignment, all political shift-shapers would hang. But that is almost never the case. Sweet talking incumbents are rarely voted out of office. In safe districts, their tenure is more secure, if such a thing can be imagined, even than public school teachers. It’s hard not to feel a tinge of compassion for Gruber and Barnes. Gruber’s dalliance with the truth will cost him dearly. The bright side for him is that he will be paying less in taxes on his future diminished income. Mr. Malloy won’t fire Barnes, but someone near to the governor might well take him to the woodshed and spank his fanny. Likely, someone already has got to Mr. Barnes with the message: In the future, be more obscure!

Connecticut’s recurring deficit is only dot 1 in a puzzling series of dots rarely connected by the state’s perennially misled voters.

Consider dot 2: More than three years ago, Gregory Hayes, United Technologies Corp.'s (UTC) Chief Financial Officer (CFO), told a group of Wall Street investment analysts "Anyplace outside of Connecticut is low-cost," which certainly is true enough. Connecticut’s high taxes and its tar pit of regulations punish homegrown entrepreneurs. Hayes added ominously, “Even if work has to stay in the U.S., there are opportunities to reduce cost by moving out of those high-cost locations.”

Apparently, the CFO’s nod in the direction of what might be called, with a bow towards Otto Von Bismarck, “business realpolitik” spooked crony capitalists in the Malloy administration because, sometime later, UTC was added to the list of companies in Connecticut given special deals that resulted in tax abatements and other preferments. Pfizer pulled up stakes when its preferment’s ran out, and UBS, petted and stroked by both former Governor Rell and Malloy, has not met prior commitments, according to which the company was to retain 2,000 employees in Stamford, reduced from 4,200 more than ten years ago, in exchange for $20 million in tax funds that, some think, might have been better spent on Connecticut’s three social service agencies -- the Department of Children and Families, the Department of Developmental Services and the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services – which assist Connecticut’s orphaned and abused children as well as the state's mentally retarded and mentally ill. The operations of all three agencies were cut by the Malloy administration.

During his campaign for re-election Governor Dannel Malloy boasted that, were it not for his speedy intervention last February, UTC might well have taken flight to “anyplace outside Connecticut,” where business costs are more manageable. In his campaign, Mr. Malloy flouted proudly the red feather in his cap and allowed that a deal struck between himself and UTC head honcho Chairman and Chief Executive Louis R. Chênevert would anchor certain divisions of UTC in Connecticut for (ten) years at a cost of $400 million in tax breaks .

Mr. Chenevert recently and unaccountably bumped himself off as Chairman and CEO of UTC. His replacement is -- drum roll, please – Mr. Hayes. Business experts have speculated that the chief area of disagreement between the outgoing and incoming CEO centers on the question “whether to keep the company's building systems and aerospace units together or to break them up. Chênevert, once president of Pratt&Whitney in East Hartford, preferred to hold the company together, and his resignation could be a sign that the board will pursue a split."  Based in Hartford, UTC employs 26,000 workers in Connecticut, mostly at Pratt & Whitney, Sikorsky and Hamilton Sundstrand.


Comments

dmoelling said…
Don, you've got it right again. I've heard from UTC insiders that they did not solicit the aid from the State. Gov. Malloy came bearing gifts in a hurry.

Now we are getting much higher electric bills because of a shortage of pipeline capacity in New England (a truly astonishing number). The Governors had a plan that's being kneecapped by the environmentalists. High power prices along with high gasoline and diesel prices are just one more reason for businesses to move out.
Don Pesci said…
DM,

You're right. It may be worse than you represent. UTC probably would do the state a favor in the long run if it quickly reneged on any private deal its former CEO had arranged with Malloy. Elsewhere I've pointed out that multi-billion dollar international companies like UTC generally do not adjust their prospective plans to satisfy the political ambitions of governors. Here are the links: http://donpesci.blogspot.com/search?q=UTC We'll see.
peter brush said…
No one in this world, so far as I know—and I have researched the records for years, and employed agents to help me—has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people. Nor has anyone ever lost public office thereby.
---------------
Actually, I tend to forget the second part of Mencken's pronunciamento. It seems as true as the first. My sense is that our current state and federal Ruling Grubers have an accurate estimation of our collective intelligence. After all, we've voted for Mal-loy and Presidente Pen and Phone twice. How emphatically stupider can we get?
The issue is that we as a People once upon a time recognized our limitations, and attempted to control our appetites, seek justice through constitutions. We explicitly limited the powers we have over our neighbors and compatriots through government action. The Grubers swear their allegiance and duly note their duty to uphold, and have proceeded to govern for decades now through lies and deceit. At this point, I'm not sure they aren't overestimating the population. Dumbed down after decades of government education, it may not need to be deceived to go along with idiotic policies.

Speaking of the budget, what are we to make of the firing of the Labor Relations lady? All indications are that she is a straight shooter. I suppose that is the general problem. It's harder for a team to cheat if some players are unwilling. (God Bless Jonathan Turley.) What does it say about our State that we have to pay someone $170g/year simply to manage our government employee labor union contracts? Aside from the putative insult to our intelligence, what it says to me is that we are not remotely a self-governing republic.

Happy Thanksgiving, and thanks to you, Don, for your work.

Popular posts from this blog

Obamagod!

My guess is that Barack Obama is a bit too modest to consider himself a Christ figure , but artist will be artists. And over at “ To Wit ,” a blog run by professional blogger, journalist, radio commentator and ex-Hartford Courant religious writer Colin McEnroe, chocolateers will be chocolateers. Nice to have all this attention paid to Christ so near to Easter.

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Did Chris Murphy Engage in Private Diplomacy?

Murphy after Zarif blowup -- Getty Images Connecticut U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, up for reelection this year, had “a secret meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif during the Munich Security Conference” in February 2020, according to a posting written by Mollie Hemingway , the Editor-in-Chief of The Federalist. Was Murphy commissioned by proper authorities to participate in the meeting, or was he freelancing? If the former, there is no problem. If the latter, Murphy was courting political disaster. “Such a meeting,” Hemingway wrote at the time, “would mean Murphy had done the type of secret coordination with foreign leaders to potentially undermine the U.S. government that he accused Trump officials of doing as they prepared for Trump’s administration. In February 2017, Murphy demanded investigations of National Security Advisor Mike Flynn because he had a phone call with his counterpart-to-be in Russia. “’Any effort to undermine our nation’s foreign policy – e