Skip to main content

PEOPLE BEFORE PROFITS

Private health-insurance companies, to be raising premiums by 39%? Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, gave the breaking news that WellPoint, which owns the Anthem Blue Cross of California, was rich. It made $2.7 billion in the last quarter of 2009, which could not, she asserted, “justify massive increases,” and she announced a hearing.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid declared it was “greedy insurance companies that care more about profits than people.” Representative Henry Waxman announced his own additional Federal investigation.

President Obama expanded. It’s a “portrait of the future if we don’t do something now.” (Or is it a portrait of the future if they pass ObamaCare?) The President’s proposal, revealed a few days later, would add a new bureaucracy to his administration, the Health Insurance Rate Agency (HIRE), to wrestle with corporate greed and stifle premiums. This was a welcome opportunity to control the insurance industry.

“The WellPoint Mugging” was The Wall Street Journal’s editorial of February 18, with explanations, but perhaps Obama-and-Friends had not read it.

The federal Cobra regulations require insurance companies to extend the policies for 18-36 months of those who have lost their jobs, and California regulations extend that extension. This is how WellPoint lost $58 million in 2009, which is why it had to raise premiums or be assailed by shareholders, or leave the region. In short, the high premium-hike was not WellPoint’s fault.

California like all states has its own state insurance commissioner whom California insurance firms must inform of their proposals to raise premiums. WellPoint had reported its proposed increase to the California State Insurance Commissioner three months earlier, but he had not responded. WellPoint had put off actually raising the premiums till May.

What will be the effect of ObamaCare and its mandates on premiums? That is the basic question. They will all be increased, the amount depending on the market and the region.

In the 14 states where WellPoint has subsidiaries and whose actuarial data it has scrutinized, premiums are likely to triple on account of ObamaCare. The premiums paid by the young will rise the most. In Columbus, Ohio, starting from $52 a month, the premium will rise to $79 (the same for all who apply), bringing the cost to $134. Add $17 for higher benefit levels required by ObamaCare. Add another $6 for policy-holders’ share of the tax on insurance companies. Look for a total of $157, a 199% increase for individuals.

For families of four, the increase is 122%.

The average small employer in New York City will find his premium increasing by 6%, but under the same employer it will increase by 94%  in Indianapolis, 91% in St. Louis, and 53% in Milwaukee.


A WellPoint hearing before Representative Bart Stupak’s Oversight subcommittee was held on February 25 and attended by WellPoint’s Chief Executive, an attractive young woman named Angela Braly, with the company’s head auditor. Three WellPoint policy-holders testified. They had complained to the company about their premium increases and were offered other less expensive policies, which, however, did not fit their needs.

CEO Braly explained that some rates were raised as high as 39% but the overall average was 25%. As for the profit of $2.7 billion for the fourth quarter of 2009, which had angered Secretary Sebelius, Braly attempted to explain that $2.2 billion of that was a one-time transaction for the sale of a subsidiary.

Four of the five committee members present in the sparsely attended hearing room were visibly hostile. Mr. Waxman called attention to WellPoint’s administrative costs as if somehow they were invented or at least exaggerated. He glared at a targeted profits figure of 7%, which the CEO said was actually 5%.

Profits for insurance companies are not popular. Senator Jay Rockefeller the following day at the White House Summit framed his views in an emotional excoriation of the insurance industry for putting profits ahead of people. In his opinion, the industry’s purpose was as a social-welfare agency, though he did not explicitly say so. Fifty years ago, all Economics 101 textbooks taught that the purpose of a corporation is “to maximize profits.” Say that today and you will be shunned as a spokesman for the oppressive capitalist system.

Angela Braly was asked how much she makes as CEO, which she answered precisely. It was a little over a million dollars a year. The Company had spent $3.7 million on a corporate retreat, to maintain relations with its customers, she said. She emphasized the company’s concern that premiums were so costly, pointing out that other branches of health-care were even-more-costly. She explained whenever she was allowed to, but time seemed short as were the tempers of four of her five interrogators.

She did not have an opportunity to give a comparison of WellPoint’s income with competitors’—not that that would have helped her case—but The Wall Street Journal did. WellPoint’s per-month per-member income compared with those of its two largest nonprofit competitors in California was $12.62, Blue Shield’s $13.22, and Kaiser’s $18.45. Miss Braly may or may not have a chance to make that point before the two hearings under Secretary Sebelius and Representative Waxman. The Sebelius hearing is scheduled for March 3.

WellPoint will show what may happen to the premiums of insurance companies if the ObamaCare bill should pass.

By Natalie Sirkin
c2010

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

  Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.   In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.   The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."   "Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.   “No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. Th...