Skip to main content

The State of Lamont’s State


Governor Ned Lamont delivered his second State of the State on the first Wednesday in February to a General Assembly bulging with eupeptic progressives. Democrats have been in charge of the budget writing General Assembly for the last few decades. It is true in Connecticut, as elsewhere in the nation, that the governor proposes budgets to the legislature, but it is the legislature that disposes of budgets, usually in close consultation with governors of the same party.

Lamont’s State of the State address was launched two days after President Donald Trump delivered before a bitterly divided U.S. Congress his State of the Nation address. Trump failed to shake Speaker of the U.S. House’s proffered hand at the beginning of the hostilities, and Nancy Pelosi ripped up the presidential signed State of the Union address at the end of the hostilities, which show no sign of abating.

The handshake has an interesting history. It developed in 5th century Greece as a means of indicating non-hostile relations. An empty, outstretched hand offered in greeting showed that the greeter was unarmed. In the Middle Ages, a vigorous handshake was deployed to shake from loose clothing any concealed weaponry.

Pelosi’s quickly withdrawn outstretched hand concealed no dagger because the downward thrust of the Democrat’s impeachment bill was still to be deflected by Republicans. It is uncertain that the end of the process, a dismissal of the bill of impeachment by the Republican controlled Senate, will end attempts by Democrats to force Trump from office and so symbolically repeal the president’s 2016 election victory over an aggrieved Hillary Clinton. Pretty much everyone, including Trump, thinks the Democrats will be back at the same corner, should Trump win re-election in ten months, hawking the same impeachment elixir.

In Connecticut, there is no such deadly animosity between Democrats and Republicans, possibly because Democrats have been ruling the roost in the General Assembly for a good long while, longer than the young college age progressives in the state, many of whom are working feverishly to elevate to the White House the nation’s first socialist president, have been alive.  Familiarity with the run of things does not breed contempt among Connecticut Republicans; it breeds familiarity. Over long periods of time, the creaking and worn back benches begin to feel like plush divans. Republicans in the state have never known how to campaign. Elections in the northeast are won on social rather than economic issues.

Democrat leader of the Senate Martin Looney liked the tone of the State of the State address – upbeat. And Democrat leader in the House Joe Arisimowicz thrilled to Lamont’s optimism. “I loved the idea of being the champions of Connecticut,” he said. “At some level, we all raise our hand and take an oath of office and we’re going to not only observe the Constitution but we’re going to act in the taxpayers’ behalf. And every time that you say that you can’t trust government, that’s a direct slap at the people’s trust in the government. We need to be out there and start talking positively about Connecticut.”

If majority Democrats were to board a CTFasttrack bus to Hell, the trip down would be considerably relieved with Lamont as the Devil’s co-pilot. He has a way of triumphing through shear exuberance over the most depressing news by inflating himself with gobs of optimism. Three years ago, Lamont noted, the Wall Street Journal was asking, “What’s the matter with Connecticut?” But today, after Lamont jaw-jawed the opinion editors of the Journal, the paper had changed its tone – “The state has dug a deep hole--maybe it has now stopped digging.”

Lamont’s enthusiasm, we are told by CTMirror, “was briefly rewarded with a bipartisan standing ovation. “The rest of the country is looking at our state in a new light — so should you. Optimism is contagious!” Lamont intoned.

But the hole cannot be conjured away through eupeptic incantations. The way UP is the same as the way DOWN – only in reverse. And there is no indication in Lamont’s directional map that the drivers, at long last, have got the message. If high taxes, burdensome regulations and the renting out to unelected commissions of the Constitutional getting and spending obligations of the greatest deliberative body in the state point downwards, then way up is plain. Reverse everything – control runaway spending, moderate destructive ambitions, withdraw the crushing tentacles of state management from a creative and independent marketplace, discontinue investing in failed processes and invest in successful governance -- and Connecticut will begin to revive. It will stop digging its own grave.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p