Skip to main content

Governor Blumie

Mark it on the calendar: On March 18, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal ended the most prolonged petting session in Connecticut’s political history. Columnist Kevin Rennie has revealed that Blumenthal was – seriously folks – throwing his hat into the gubernatorial ring. The Democrat Party has for 20 long years been trying to entice the camera shy Blumenthal to run for something – anything – but attorney general, and he now has semi-definitively said that he will go all the way.

Blumenthal’s announcement follows former attorney general Elliot Spitzer’s successful run for governor in New York. The attorneys general have been in the habit for many years of following each other around like a string of doggies, nose to tail, and it’s possible that Blumie, noting Spitzer’s successful venture in New York, figured to copy his template. Or perhaps Blumie simply tired of trotting out old excuses when political functionaries in Greenwich asked him for the hundredth time when he planned to run for governor or US senator -- or anything but attorney general.

Or could it be this? Rumors abound that the wildly popular current governor, Jodi Rell, intends not to run for a second term in her own right after having “gotten it done.”

Gotten what done?

Like her predecessor once removed, Lowell Weicker, Rell has proven to be something of a disappointment to her Republican cohorts, who are generally more conservative than Weicker but more liberal than, say, Ann Coulter. Weicker was the guy who “got it done” and gave us a state income tax, after having given every indication that he opposed such a tax in his gubernatorial campaign.

Bill Cibes' Democrat primary campaign was structured around the necessity of an income tax. After Cibes lost the primary to Bruce Morrison, Weicker, who defeated John Rowland in a three man race, then appointed Cibes as the head of his Office of Policy Management, not a comforting sign to those who believed Weicker’s campaign malarkey.

Together, the two of them “got it done” and gave us an income tax, which removed all restraints on spending. Connecticut’s budget has more than doubled since the tax was instituted; the state’s auxiliary budget, its bonding, has increased proportionally; businesses are fleeing the state and nuisance taxes have metastasized. Even Weicker, some time ago, was heard to complain, “Where did all the money go?”

During her own campaign, Rell more than once simply refused to debate her opponent, the tax and spend quasi-socialist mayor of New Haven John DeStefano, while continually giving off the odor of a governor who, like former governor John Rowland, would serve as a fire wall against the tax and spend Democrats. Once elected, Rell proposed a budget that busted the state cap on spending by raising Weicker’s income tax to furnish yet more tax money to an already overstuffed educational empire. Naturally, this left a few frowns on the faces of what remains of the Republican Party, leaving the way open to a Blumie run.

Blumenthal’s critics are out there plugging away. The Competitive Enterprise Institute’s report on delinquent attorneys general is particularly harsh on Blumenthal, named in the report as the worst attorney general in the United States, but the data in such critical analyses seems rarely to pass through the Connecticut media’s selective semi-permeable membrane.

So then, in his bid for governor – assuming the rumors are true that Rell does not intend to run again – Blumenthal will face the ghost of a Republican Party, an adulatory media and a brokered spot on the Democratic ticket. There is no enemy to the right. On the left, the sans culottes who deposed Sen. Joe Lieberman in a primary, deprived of a contender who has publicly backed an unpopular president, will lose much of their sting.

How can he possibly lose? No doubt, Blumenthal, ever the cautious politician, has asked himself that question and, having come up with a satisfying answer, now has ventured out on the gubernatorial campaign limb.

Comments

Don Pesci said…
It's very early to be making predictions, I know. Malloy certainly deserves another bite at that apple, but the pressure to defer to Blumenthal will be well nigh irresistible. I agree with you that Malloy is a thoughtful politician.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p