Skip to main content

The Political Underpinnings of the One Party State

Connecticut’s General Assembly biennial session has ended. Conservatives and right of center moderates in the state will be put in mind of Gideon Tucker’s quip: “No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.”

 

Connecticut voters, too many of whom have left the state for greener pastures elsewhere, have long understood the inverse connection between taxes, state regulations and a vibrant economy. Just as wide awake voters know that a tariff is a hidden tax on consumption, so the same voters know that a regulation is a tax and a drag on productivity. Profits and creative business development are casually linked. When business profits are drained off by taxes and regulations, creativity, the lifeblood of successful business enterprise, is curtailed.

 

Voters also know that whatever you tax tends to disappear. If you raise the tax on millionaires – the so called “idle rich” progressive politicians intend to plunder to pay for their improvident and reckless spending -- millionaires will disappear. And the same is true of business opportunities.

 

Legislative bills are called bills for a good reason. Someone, most often middle class taxpayers, must eventually pay the bills. The federal income tax, it may be recalled, was first introduced as a means by which “millionaires” of the post-Civil War period might discharge the nation’s war debt. The millionaires’ tax quickly was extended to non-millionaires. Today, federal and state taxes, rising costs, inflation and stagnant wages have considerably decreased the marginal assets of Connecticut’s working class. Over the years, private budgets have increasingly been reduced by all four culprits mentioned above.

 

Deficit spending kills both productivity and marketplace creativity. Taxes and regulations do the same.

 

We’ve known for decades that the predictable consequences of a one-party state present disruptive cultural and economic problems.

 

The one party state historically has been the oppressive anti-democratic state: the monarchical state of French King Louis XVI before he lost his head to the guillotine; the anti-republican Roman state of Julius Caesar before he was assassinated; and the failed socialist/communist/fascist states of Joseph Stalin in Russia, Adolf Hitler in Germany, Benito Mussolini in Italy and Mao Zedong in China. Asked to define fascism, Mussolini summed up the fascist doctrine this way: Everything in the state, nothing outside the state, nothing above the state, hardly a conservative or libertarian rubric. And an autocratic state needs a single party to effectuate its rule.

 

The difficulty with the single party state is not that it cannot do certain things. Just the opposite is true. The chief difficulty of the one party state is that, in the absence of practical opposition, it may do everything it pleases.

 

"If God does not exist, anything is permissible" Ivan tells us in Feodor Dostoyevsky novel “The Brothers Karamazov.” In a unitary state, anything is permissible.

 

This was not regarded as a difficulty by the most powerful autocrats of the 20th century, Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini and Mao. They were content to dispense with republican political forms that limited the scope of state power, such as an independent congress, a politically disinterested judiciary and a working constitution. Along with the Sun King, all four 20th century autocrats could truly say “L'État, c'est moi (I am the state),” and the single party, of course, is the administrative arm of the unitary state, ultimately serving at the will of a single party leader – or, perhaps worse, at the behest of a single party caucus.

 

The real danger of the single party state is that its leader or leaders become, in the absence of an active and corrective opposition, the political equivalent of secular gods, the ultimate anti-democratic arbiters of the public good.

 

For all practical purposes, Connecticut has been a one part state for the past three decades. Democrats now control the governorship, the General Assembly, and the judiciary, all or nearly all the state Supreme Court justices having been selected by Democrat Party leaders and the governor. In addition, Democrats control all the state’s constitutional offices, such as the office of Attorney General. Before moving into the U.S. Congress, Dick Blumenthal had held the office for two decades. His predecessor, U.S. Senator Joe Lieberman was Attorney General for six years. Some believe current occupant William Tong is readying himself for a U.S. senatorial bid should one of the two U.S. senatorial offices fall vacant, whether through accident or design.

 

For the past fifty years, Democrats have controlled Connecticut’s larger cities, and the cities have become political welfare dependents of the dominant party. While complaining volubly for the last few decades that state Republicans have turned a cold eye to the constitutional separation of powers, state Democrats presently are hotly pursuing a municipal power grab that would make cities and towns more not less dependent upon Connecticut’s single party state. The attack on a historical separation of state and municipal powers is a project of the single party state nearing completion.

 

State Republicans have objected vociferously to the centralization of political power as offensive to both democratic and republican principles, but objections, it should be plain to everyone by now – even to co-opted  news people – can have no practical effect in a one party state.    

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Lamont Surprised at Suit Brought Against PURA

Marissa P. Gillett, the state's chief utility regulator, watches Gov. Ned Lamont field questions about a new approach to regulation in April 2023. Credit: MARK PAZNIOKAS / CTMIRROR.ORG Concerning a suit brought by Eversource and Avangrid, Connecticut’s energy delivery agents, against Connecticut’s Public Utility Regulatory Agency (PURA), Governor Ned Lamont surprised most of the state’s political watchers by affecting surprise.   “Look,” Lamont told a Hartford Courant reporter shortly after the suit was filed, “I think it is incredibly unhelpful,” Lamont said. “Everyone is getting mad at the umpires.   Eversource is not getting everything they want and they are bringing suit. It was a surprise to me. Nobody notified me. I think we have to do a better job of working together.”   Lamont’s claim is far less plausible than the legal claim made by Eversource and Avangrid. The contretemps between Connecticut’s energy distributors and Marissa Gillett , Gov. Ned Lamont’s ...

Maureen Dowd vs Chris Murphy

  Maureen Dowd, a longtime New York Times columnist who never has been over friendly to Donald Trump, was interviewed recently by Bill Maher, and she laid down the law, so to speak, to the Democrat Party.   In the course of a discussion with Maher on the recently released movie Snow White, “New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd declared Democrats are ‘in a coma’ while giving a blunt diagnosis of the party she argued had become off-putting to voters,” Fox News reported.   The Democrats, Dowd said, stopped "paying attention" to the long term political realignment of the working class. "Also,” she added, “they just stopped being any fun. I mean, they made everyone feel that everything they said and did, and every word was wrong, and people don't want to live like that, feeling that everything they do is wrong."   "Do you think we're over that era?" Maher asked.   “No," Dowd answered. "I think Democrats are just in a coma. Th...