Skip to main content

Sarsour At UConn


Ben Shapiro has come and gone. UConn alumni – students who have grown up – will be pleased to hear that there were no untoward incidents during his appearance at their university. Shapiro’s bona fides are impressive. He is a conservative political commentator, columnist, radio talk show host, lawyer, editor in chief of The Daily Wire, which he founded, and the author of Brainwashed: How Universities Indoctrinate America's Youth, a book he began writing when he was 17 years old. And he is visibly Jewish, a point that will become increasingly relevant as this column progresses.


Prior to Shapiro’s appearance at UConn, an address by Lucian Wintrich, the White House reporter for The Gateway Pundit, was repeatedly interrupted, and Wintrich’s notes were stolen from his lectern by Catherine Gregory, a student adviser at Quinebaug Valley Community College who never grew up upon graduating from her alma mater.

Wintrich was at first arrested, but charges were dropped after he had procured the services of Norm Pattis, who dangled before a judge the often iterated judicial theory that his client should not have been arrested by the UConn constabulary for attempting to retrieve his property from a thief who had stolen it. The judge agreed, Wintrich was liberated, and Gregory was arrested.

Security during Shapiro’s appearance at UConn was beefed up, psychological comfort cushions were provided to students at the university who might have been adversely impacted by Shapiro’s message, attendance was diminished when the university decided to move the event to quarters that could not accommodate expected crowds, and only university students were admitted. Such precautions usually are not necessary whenever leftist speakers appear before university audiences, likely because conservative students are not disposed to interrupt or silence speakers.

In an upcoming appearance at UConn, Linda Sarsour, described in the university’s event page as a “racial justice and civil rights activist,” need not worry that her speaking notes will be stolen by rightists in the audience. Sarsour has been invited to speak to university students by the college itself. Wintrich and Shapiro were invited to speak by the university’s Republican Club, which paid for their appearances and has now exhausted its monetary resources. The bill for Sarsour’s appearance will be picked up by the university, which has not in the past invited conservative speakers to address UConn students.

And UConn will get exactly what it paid for. Sarsour has been a supporter of Sharia Law at least since 2011, when she posted on twitter that she wished to see Sharia Law – incompatible with American law, according to many legal scholars – imposed on most countries. Sharia Law has been imposed by the sword in some areas of the world in which other religions such as Christianity, once tolerated, have been conquered by Islamic warriors such as ISIS. In her UConn address, Sarsour likely will not object to the forcible imposition of Sharia Law among Christian Copts, the largest Christian population in the Middle East and North Africa.

Nor will Sarsour likely quote from Islamic scholars on the precedence and inalterability of Sharia law: “The source of legal rulings for all acts of those who are morally responsible is Allah” (a1.1, Umdat al-salik or The Reliance of the Traveller, the commonly accepted work of Shariah jurisprudence); “There is only one law which ought to be followed, and that is the Sharia” (Seyed Qutb); “Islam wishes to destroy all states and governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program” (Seyed Abul A’ala Maududi). Under Sharia Law, a raped woman may receive the same punishment as her rapist: “The woman and the man guilty of adultery or fornication – flog each of them with a hundred stripes" (Sura 24:2).

Apart from the floggings and the violations of nearly all US Constitutional amendments, “You'll know when you're living under Sharia Law,” Sarsour has tweeted, “if suddenly all your loans and credit cards become interest free. Sound (sic) nice, doesn't it?” Islamic Law punishes usury, and not with a slap on the wrist: “O You who believe! Be careful of (your duty) to Allah and relinquish what remains (due) from usury, if you are believers. But if you do (it) not, then be apprised of war from Allah and His Apostle...” (Surah al-Baqarah 2:278-279).

Naturally, Sarsour is a critic of Israel; anti-Israeli vituperation comes with the propagandistic territory. “Is there room for people who support the state of Israel and do not criticize it in the movement?’” said Sarsour. “There can’t be in feminism. You either stand up for the rights of all women, including Palestinians, or none. There’s just no way around it.”

Some questions have been left dangling from the journalistic hangman's noose. Did UConn extend an invitation to Sarsour because the university wished  to balance a "jewish" presentation by a person who is adamantly opposed to judaism? UConn's Republican Club bore the cost of Shapiro's appearance, while Sarsour's appearance was covered by the university. Because she was a university invitee, Sarsour was able to bypass the vetting process set up by the university following disturbances caused by leftist agitators. Does the university consider equitable the manner in which the costs in both cases were assessed and discharged?  Finally, one cannot help but wonder whether UConn will extend an invitation to Ayan Hersi Ali so that she might be permitted to respond, cordially of course, to Sarsour’s vicious condemnation of her. Sarsour tweeted of Hersi Ali that she deserved an “a$$ whipping.” Sarsour also expressed a desire to take away Hersi Ali's vagina. Hersi Ali left her home in Somalia to escape Sarsour’s dystopian vision of the way things ought to be in the Western world. She fled to Europe to save herself from an arranged marriage and is today an outspoken opponent of forced genital mutilation, which she suffered at age five. Since her liberation, Hersi Ali has unfailingly stood up for the rights of women everywhere -- but not at UConn.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p