Skip to main content

Chris Murphy’s New Pal


President Donald Trump recently called to the White House one of his most acerbic critics, U.S. Senator Chris Murphy, to chat about gun control and school safety; the two are not at all the same thing. Murphy could hardly refuse. Trump wanted Murphy to shape, in concert with others, a national package that might help to prevent the slaughter of innocents in schools and also the victims of gun violence in our large cities, the nation’s shooting galleries, a “comprehensive” reform of gun laws that would ameliorate conditions in cities such as Chicago, former President Barack Obama’s abandoned haunt, and school kids left at the mercy of gun toting mass murderers.

Murphy and his confederate in the congress, Connecticut Senator Dick Blumenthal, had persistently denounced Trump as “eccentric,” and touched with madness, accusations laundered through Connecticut’s media that have been temporarily shelved now that the madman is making cooing gestures in Murphy’s direction; for, really, how could a madman be  both mad, when he is fighting excessive regulations, business destroying taxes, and the baneful effects of a dying Obamacare wreck,   and yet sane when he is cooing in the direction of Murphy and Blumenthal on the matter of gun control?

Trump strongly indicated what he wanted. The comprehensive reforms he had in mind would include an expansion of FBI background checks for gun purchasers. “We are determined,” Trump said, “to turn grief into action.”

Guns should immediately be taken from the mentally ill, Trump said: “…take the guns first, go through the legal process later.” This is the equivalent of the old Western maxim: “shoot first and ask questions later.” One can expect stiff resistance on this reform, not from the demagogued National Rifle Association (NRA), but from the American Civil Liberty Union (ACLU), which is likely to argue: If you can’t demonstrate before a judge that Mary Smith, who has no prior police record, is indeed mentally ill, then she ought to be left in peace with her lawful purchases. It is not altogether certain Murphy would favor the infiltration of sanctuary cities in Connecticut by armed federales looking to deprive illegal aliens with presumed mental problems of their illegally acquired weapons. And, of course, none of the proposals made by Murphy and Blumenthal would touch the circulation of already illegal weapons in the nation’s forgotten cities, such as shoot’em’up Chicago or Hartford, Connecticut.

According to an account in CTMirror, “Murphy repeatedly warned Trump against underestimating the gun lobby’s clout.” The Trump response to political push-back was typically Trumping: not to worry, Trump pushes back harder: After the meeting, “Murphy also said he was surprised by the president’s willingness to back so many changes to federal gun laws ‘forcefully’ and by the president’s ‘tone.’ He was very dismissive of the gun lobby.”

Murphy said Trump had “outflanked” Democrats encouraging other states to copy Connecticut’s response to school shootings by restricting guns. When Trump said he would favor allowing state courts to take away guns from those who are a danger to themselves and others without first obtaining a warrant, Murphy demurred: “I don’t think I can support that,” he said. Indeed, Murphy, whose campaign coffers currently are bursting with more than $5 million, likely has not received many campaign contributions from the NRA, but the ACLU and those who support its agenda possibly are more generous contributors, and the The ACLU is no less powerful a lobby than the NRA.

Years after Dawn Hochsprung, the heroic principal of Sandy Hook Elementary school, stepped unarmed into a killing corridor to confront Adam Lanza, armed with a semi-automatic AR15 and two semi-automatic handguns – Lanza had left a Izhmash Saiga 12-gauge semiautomatic shotgun in trunk of a car he had taken from his mother, whom he murdered with a 22 rifle – we are still pondering the question “does gun restriction alone” make schools safer? Murphy and Blumenthal have devoted most of their energies in combating the NRA lobby and banning specific firearms, but not the 22 rifle he used to shoot his mother. There are two problems with this non-comprehensive solution: 1) restrictive gun laws do not prevent the violent in our society from illegally acquiring guns and other assault weapons; 2) focusing most of the nation's attention on gun restrictions is dangerously misleading, because school safety depends chiefly on hardening schools from assaults such as occurred in Sandy Hook and most recently at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida.

According to a recent Hartford Courant report, “Nearly half the school districts in the state [of Connecticut] are violating at least some aspect of the law requiring them to submit school security information.” The law was passed more than five years ago, in response to the Sandy Hook shooting. And of course we know that the transfer of information from schools to an indifferent state will not shield some future heroic Hochsprung from some future Lanza. Harden the schools. Adopt the threat mitigation method of child protection created in Israel and adopted by the Indiana Department of Education.

But no... as Connecticut’s two senators, now joined by an allegedly eccentric president touched by madness, might say: First take the guns, then make safe the schools and cities – maybe.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p