Skip to main content

Do I Dare Disturb The Universe: Cutting Yelmini

“Do I Dare disturb the universe?” – T.S. Elliot, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock

Increasingly, the legacy media chooses not to disturb the universe. Disturbances always are politically inadvisable and inconvenient.

In Connecticut, as everyone knows, the political universe is controlled by Democrats confabing in formerly smoke-filled back rooms, where the light of publicity rarely shines. It is the age-old mission of the media to comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable, and Democrats in Connecticut rarely have been as comfortable as in the past few years, following the capture of the governor’s office in 2011 by Dannel Malloy, the first Democratic governor since the administration of Governor William O’Neill, who left office in 1991 as deficit clouds were marshalling on the horizon.

The succeeding Governor, Lowell Weicker, blew the clouds away by instituting an income tax that, he said, would in the future relieve legislators of relying on a cracker-jack box of niggling little taxes – many of which were imposed later by Mr. Malloy, who channeled Mr. Weicker during his first term in office.

At the beginning of his second term, Mr. Malloy promised numerous times to impose no more taxes; enough was enough! The budget writing committee in the state legislature, dominated by progressives, now has done the dirty deed for him by producing a tax and spend plan that would be the envy of the Democrats in the National Governors Association (NGA) Mr. Malloy hopes to herd as its 2016 chairman.    

The best investigative reporters follow stories to the gates of Hell, which shall not prevail against them, and the more courageous of them are singed by the flames to secure data necessary for their narratives.  In Connecticut, the Hillary Clinton solution to possibly explosive e-mails – set up your own server and be careful to destroy any incriminating  communications – was not available to Governor Dannel Malloy’s budget director Ben Barnes and his chief of staff Mark Ojakian on the occasion of Mr. Barnes’ firing of Linda Yelmini, for 28 years the state’s labor-relations chief.

It was a curious firing. Ms. Yelmini was by all appearances a competent negotiator. While her rulings may have rubbed the fur of union leaders the wrong way on occasion, many doffed their hats to her professionalism and were surprised at her abrupt dismissal – so they said. She knows considerably more about spending and cost saving measures than Mr. Malloy’s chief factotum, Policy and Management guru Ben Barnes, who lately has been having the devil of a time balancing the state’s checkbook. And hidden inconspicuously behind the flower pot for two decades, she probably knows more about politics than the upcoming Chair of the NGA.

The unpleasantries of the firing were left to Mr. Barnes, who hoped, after he had shown Ms. Yelmini the door, she would not be too retaliatory. A trail of e-mails between budget director Ben Barnes and chief of staff Mark Ojakian was unearthed by Hartford Courant investigative reporter Jon Lender by means of a Freedom of Information request. 
 Barnes: "It's done."
  
Ojakian: "So I saw. I was copied on a letter to Governor. … Was it awful? Will she go quietly!"
  
Barnes: "Awful. [Expletive] awful. Not quiet."
  
Ojakian: "She also texted me and asked me to call her. I told her I have been on vacation. She will create problems I fear. And now I see she has tried to call me twice."
  
Barnes: "Sorry. She really wants to know why, but I don't think it makes sense to have that discussion with her."
  
Ojakian: "I agree. And don't be sorry. We are all in this together. She said she thought she was doing a good job. She's shocked and disappointed. I'm not responding anymore. Just wanted you to know."

Indeed, knowing is nice – but only for the keepers of the secrets in state government.

Mr. Lender acknowledges we may never know who wanted Ms. Yelmini fired or why, but there is little question that Mr. Barnes, Mr. Ojakian and, through him, Mr. Malloy were all in on the hit; they were “all in this together.” Mr. Lender notes that Ms. Yelmini hired and fired state employees, a function that “earned her a reputation as the state's ‘terminator,’ and now Barnes and company have terminated the terminator, who may know more about issues involving firing than anybody.”

There are theories a ’plenty.  One theory holds that Ms. Yelmini was dismissed because a) she has been competent in pension negotiations, and b) she has mapped the closets in which all the dead bodies have been stored. Mr. Malloy, under this theory, needs someone less competent, independent and resourceful (read: “more political”) than Ms. Yelmini when the time comes, if ever, for Mr. Malloy to pretend he has reached a tax saving agreement with state union leaders. It’s always difficult for a magician to fool the crowd when his assistant has ideas of her own. The best ministers in the one party state are those who happily conspire in the general fraud – “yes” men like Mr. Barnes and Mr. Ojakian. M. Yelmeni knew how to say “no.”


Ms. Yelmini’s independence may have been her undoing. In the one party state, cooperation is far more important than competence, and it is possible to lose a job you have done too well.

Comments

peter brush said…
The Yelmin layoff is still beyond my comprehension. It doesn't appear that the woman brought in to replace her is notably more pro-labor. As Ms. Yelmin said back in 2003, the Governor can lay people off, but rationality and openness in management are preferred by the shareholders.
-----------------
“If they lay off the wrong people, it could cost the state a lot of money,” said Dan Livingston, chief negotiator for the State Employee Bargaining Agent Coalition. SEBAC negotiates health and pension benefits for the 13 state employee unions and 31 bargaining units.

Livingston claims too many contract violations have been made in recent weeks to count.

Admitting some mistakes have been made, state officials disagree that large numbers of workers have been wrongly laid off and could someday return to their jobs with hefty amounts of back pay. They are unfazed by the flurry of labor grievances expected in the coming weeks.

Linda Yelmini, director of the state Office of Labor Relations, said a similar tactic was taken by unions in 1991, when former Gov. Lowell P. Weicker Jr. laid off about 1,400 people.

In the end, she said, most were settled and only a few went before an independent arbitrator.

“The governor has the right to lay people off,” Yelmini said.

http://blog.ctnews.com/politicalcapitol/2011/06/28/layoffs-not-as-simple-as-issuing-pink-slips/
-=-------------
Lisa Grasso Egan will be the Malloy administration’s new labor lawyer, according to an announcement released late last week.

Attorney Egan’s on-line professional biography brags,

“Ms. Egan has successfully defended employers in numerous litigation matters brought by discharged employees whose claims have included wrongful termination, First Amendment retaliation, and discrimination.”
https://jonathanpelto.com/category/linda-yelmini/

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p