Skip to main content

NARAL For Donovan, The Democrat’s Nixon

The picture shows former State House Speaker Chris Donovan smiling broadly and sporting new hair on his face, a white trimmed beard and moustache. He is chatting with Lieutenant Governor Nancy Wyman, who is smiling and appears to be sharing a humorous confidence with Mr. Donovan.

Could she be remarking on his spiffy new look? Or perhaps she is congratulating the recipient of NARAL’s (National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws) attentions at having escaped the prosecutorial noose that hanged his campaign finance director and other staff members who worked on Mr. Donovan’s failed U.S. House bid in Connecticut’s 5th District.


The reporting on Mr. Donovan’s fall from grace into the clutches of an FBI sting operation has left a bad taste in the mouth of uber-progressive Democratic operative Tom Swan, Mr. Donovan’s former campaign manager. According to a report in the Hartford Courant, Mr. Swan has refused to speak with the paper in the absence of an apology for what he has called the Courant’s “character assassination [of Mr. Donovan] and lack of journalistic integrity” with respect to its reporting on the FBI sting operation.

Mr. Swan came late to the Donovan campaign for the 5th. He arrived on the scene after the FBI had sprung its trap, catching in its unforgiving jaws Mr. Donovan’s former campaign manager who, having determined not to cooperate in the FBI sting, was duly sent up the river.

A small book might easily be written about the 5th District races. Mr. Donovan was not alone in being swept up in the euphoria of election.

The FBI has been more than fair in its tortuous prosecutions. On the Republican side, former Governor and felon John Rowland, then a radio talk show host, was prosecuted and found guilty of corruption charges after Lisa-Wilson Foley, running on the Republican ticket for the U.S. House in the 5th, decided to cooperate in the FBI investigation and fed Mr. Rowland to the same sting-operators that had left not a scratch on Mr. Donovan’s Teflon coated reputation. Ms. Foley emerged from the ordeal with a whole hide, while Mr. Rowland, then a friendless journalist, was sent up the river – AGAIN, as Connecticut’s ink stained wretches noted in their reports. No Republican of any stature has told anyone in Connecticut’s media they will not talk to the press until political commentators apologize for having failed to come to the aid of a journalist who was exercising his First Amendment rights in preferring Ms. Foley to other Democrats in the 5th District field.

Largely because of the FBI prosecutions, the 5th District seat was taken by Democrat Elizabeth Esty, the principal beneficiary of the interventions. Along the way, Andrew Roraback, the Republican Party nominee for the seat, was given the editorial boot by the same people now snubbed by Mr. Swan. Mr. Roraback, whose position on abortion is as reliably left as that of Mr. Donovan, was later rewarded with an appointment to Connecticut’s Superior Court by Governor Dannel Malloy.

Despite Mr. Swan’s brief against newspapers, there are no Democratic losers following the “Taking of the Fifth” by Democrats. Mrs. Esty has just won re-election against a Republican Party candidate in the 5th whose testimony was at least partly responsible for the conviction of radio talk show host Rowland, Connecticut’s Republican Nixon. Mr. Roraback, shuttled off to Superior Court, has been removed as a possible future contender. And the progressive rehabilitation of Mr. Donovan, even Mr. Swan cannot have failed to notice, is well underway.

In late November, Donovan was honored by NARAL Pro-Choice Connecticut for his advocacy on behalf of legalized abortion and access to birth control. Along with social worker Nancy Humphreys, he was awarded the group's Catherine Roraback Award, named after the civil rights attorney in Connecticut best known for representing Estelle Griswold and Dr. C. Lee Buxton in the famous 1965 Supreme Court case, Griswold v. Connecticut, which legalized the use of birth control and created the precedent of the ‘right to privacy’ later employed by an imaginative Supreme Court to rid the United States of its anti-abortion demons. Catherine Roraback was Andrew Roraback’s cousin.

Mr. Donovan – “Connecticut’s best feminist,” according to a NARAList -- told the group during the ceremony that his path to feminism was curious: “I grew up in the '50s and '60s. There were a lot of women who set me straight." One of them was an emancipated woman who one day told Mr. Donovan that, going forward, she would not be shaving her underarms. Mr. Donovan’s first reaction was outrage, but the feminist set him straight: "We were outraged as men that she could even think to do that. But she would say to us, 'Why are you so upset about it? That's my choice ...' She helped teach us what it is all about."


Such was Mr. Donovan’s Damascus Road revelation. For the committed NAREList, there is little difference between declining to shave your underarms and procuring a partial birth abortion. Since stumbling over an FBI sting operation, “Connecticut’s best feminist” has plowed valiantly forward. One door is shut, another opens. Progress never ends, and neither does progressivism, the doctrine that everything but progressive government must be reformed. Some suspect there may be a future for Mr. Donovan in academia, a secular version of the purgatorium, where old progressives are held until the grim reaper comes a’calling.

Comments

peter brush said…
John Rowland should be pardoned. What he did may be a technical violation of the election law rig our Grubers occasionally take seriously. They take it not so seriously when it involves Dannel Mal-loy or especially a Kennedy. What harm did Rowland do that he hasn't paid for many times over in his present travails?

The New Haven "Register" demands severe punishment, and equates Rowland's crimes to those of Hack Donovan's Right-hand Hacks. The two cases are not similar. It is quite easy to view the actions of Team Donovan as classic corruption of policy by means of cash pro quo. On the other hand, it's impossible to view Rowland's clandestine employment by the Foley-Wilson campaign as corruption of any office at all. To boot, it was certainly possible for the jury to have acquitted based on the evidence that he actually did work for the Foley business. Rowland's crime was at most an insult to our National Government's fetish for maximum egalitarian democratic procedure. Give the franchise to people waded across the Rio Grande twenty years ago, to Fergusonians who actually dislike the country, to felons, to people who can't read or write, but throw Rowland in the dungeon.
Klinton-appointed Judge Atherton should uphold the rule of law by giving Rowland the lightest possible sentence, suspended, if possible. Scold him, if she wants, and require that he read the Hartford "Courant" every morning and listen to Connecticut Public Radio every night.
---------------
Rowland’s and Braddock’s crimes were similar in severity and in that both could have easily avoided breaking the law. Braddock was accepting campaign donations through straw donors to conceal the identities of roll-your-own-tobacco businessmen who could have legally donated to the campaign or PACs supporting it in multiple ways. Rowland could have worked as a consultant for Wilson-Foley’s campaign legally. He could have been paid publicly through the campaign, which had ample funds for such a role. Or he could have done real work for Brian Foley’s nursing home chain. It still would have been a gray area and a quid pro quo skirting of campaign finance laws, but one unlikely to have led to criminal charges...

...Judge Arterton would be right in sending a strong message about Rowland’s new crimes. The sentence should send chills down the spine of any Connecticut political operative engaged in or considering similar perversions of the democratic process in our state.
http://www.nhregister.com/opinion/20140920/editorial-john-rowland-deserves-lengthy-prison-sentence
----------------------------
...The ethnic Chinese magnate's ties to the Clintons have been a source of heated controversy since the late 1990s, when Riady became embroiled in one of the murkiest episodes of the Clinton presidency -- a campaign fundraising scandal that caused a big political ruckus in Washington amid Republican Party allegations, never proved, of meddling by China's intelligence services in American politics...

Riady, 52, declined to be interviewed but, in an e-mailed response to written questions, he said the teachings of Christ "inform all that I do." He said he hadn't seen the Clintons during his 2009 trips to America but did pay $20,000 to become a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, an annual gathering of prominent figures in politics, business and philanthropy sponsored by Bill Clinton.

The saga brought Riady and his family-run conglomerate, Lippo Group, an $8.6 million fine, the biggest penalty in the history of U.S. campaign finance violations...
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/01/04/AR2010010403106.html
Don Pesci said…
Concerning Rowland: Very well said.Political mobs, like any other mobs, are not satisfied with plain justice. Their thirst is slaked only by a hanging.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p