Skip to main content

Malloy To Voters: The Joke’s On You


There is no danger anyone will read into the remarks made by Governor Dannel Malloy to the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce (MCC) a gubernatorial resolve to reduce Connecticut’s burdensome taxes or regulations.

Just the opposite; even reporters “got” the joke made by Mr. Malloy towards the end of his MCC speech when the Governor was asked, following his remark that he had “righted the ship” of state, whether he feared he was raising expectations that could not be met, in view of Connecticut’s still doubtful economic rebound.

According to the official arbiter of U.S. recessions, the National Bureau of Economic Research, the “Great Recession,” which started with the subprime mortgage crisis in December 2007 and ended in June 2009, lasted a little over 18 months. Although the national recession had ended fifteen years ago, Connecticut has yet to fully recover the jobs it lost during the protracted recession. In addition, the state is now facing yet another deficit, which followed claims made by Mr. Malloy during his gubernatorial campaign that the state’s books were in balance. In fact, they were out of kilter by about $100 million, a datum that, had it been certified during the election, might have cost Mr. Malloy enough votes to push him into the loser category.

“’Not now that the election is over, no,’ Malloy said, his face deadpan. Then he laughed.”

It was a bit of an inside joke. Inside jokes among chief executives and the media usually fly over the heads of duped voters.

Here is the joke: The election is now over, and Mr. Malloy won it by a slender majority over a Republican competitor who had argued that Mr. Malloy’s bookkeeping was, to put it gently, as ingenious as it was disingenuous.  The books were not in balance, Republicans had cautioned. While it is now obvious in the post-election period that Republicans had won the disputed point, they had lost the election. Harry Truman once said he would rather be right than President. Mr. Malloy was now turning the Truman apothegm on its head and hinting, with a knowing wink at the media, that if you are president – or, in his case, governor – the winning of an election makes moot election disputes. If you win the game, fouls committed during the campaign don’t matter.

Get it?

One may be sure reporters attending Mr. Malloy’s lecture on political amorality got it. “It was a joke,” one reporter noted in his story, “colored by the reality that one political challenge has been met, even if plenty remain. With a 28,000-vote win, Malloy has four more years.”

And what does Mr. Malloy and the Democratic dominated General Assembly plan to do during those four years? Cut spending?” Nope. Shout “cut spending” in the General Assembly and you will be greeted with an embarrassed silence. Does Mr. Malloy intend to raise taxes? No, said he during his campaign. However, some reporters and commentators will remember Mr. Malloy insisted during the same campaign that the state’s books were in balance. For clever politicians addicted to tax increases, there surely is more than one way to skin a taxpayer. Removing tax line items from the budget and transferring them to the state’s credit card, its borrowing slush fund, is one way to reduce a deficit without raising taxes. During his first campaign for governor, Mr. Malloy heartily condemned such practices as a disreputable accounting sleight of hand often indulged in by sinister Republican gubernatorial reprobates.

After the election, if you are Mr. Malloy, you just begin the future with a wiped slate. You have four more years to spin the roulette wheel. You may safely put behind you all the red ink -- such as possible future deficits brought about by shrinking revenue streams; thanks to fracking, gas prices are down, and with them state revenues from the highest gas taxes in the nation. Connecticut’s economy is still running on half its cylinders, and the sluggish economy reduces cash reserves. His next biennial budget will be in the red by about $2.8 billion. And then, though nearly everyone in state government is loathe to mention debt obligations, at $65 billion near tops per capita in the nation, Mr. Malloy did promise to hack away at that debt.  Where will the money to pay state bills come from? The middle class in Connecticut, which solicitous progressives claim to represent, has no juice left in it.

Never you mind: Mr. Malloy is on to the next BIG THING; he has turned the page on adversity.

I’m working on a big vision,” Mr. Malloy told the Middlesex Chamber of Commerce “I’m working on what it will take for us to be competitive with other states and I’m going to lead that discussion. Then people can tell me what needs to come off the list.”

Another day, another spending list, another bully pulpit speech, another BIG VISION. Even Teddy Roosevelt took a breath from time to time. Not Mr. Malloy. He rushes past the sign overhanging the gates of Hell: “Abandon all hope ye who enter here” – straight into the fiery furnace, his green tie flapping gaily in the flames.

Comments

peter brush said…
“The death of the spirit is the price of progress. Nietzsche revealed this mystery of the Western apocalypse when he announced that God was dead and that He had been murdered. This Gnostic murder is constantly committed by the men who sacrificed God to civilization. The more fervently all human energies are thrown into the great enterprise of salvation through world–immanent action, the farther the human beings who engage in this enterprise move away from the life of the spirit. And since the life the spirit is the source of order in man and society, the very success of a Gnostic civilization is the cause of its decline.
A civilization can, indeed, advance and decline at the same time—but not forever. There is a limit toward which this ambiguous process moves; the limit is reached when an activist sect which represents the Gnostic truth organizes the civilization into an empire under its rule. Totalitarianism, defined as the existential rule of Gnostic activists, is the end form of progressive civilization.”
― Eric Voegelin, The New Science of Politics: An Introduction
------------
The worst government is often the most moral. One composed of cynics is often very tolerant and humane. But when fanatics are on top there is no limit to oppression.
H. L. Mencken


peter brush said…
“’Not now that the election is over, no,’ Malloy said, his face deadpan. Then he laughed.”
------
Our cynicism and that of our pols is now apparently universally recognized and almost completely accepted. The question for the progressives is now not whether to lie, but only the stylishness of the lying. Malloy down around 3 or 4 on the scale on which Bill Klinton is rated a 10.
When will we simply do away with the oaths of office? If we expect our governing class to lie to us in either campaigning or day-to-day governance what's the point of an oath? Better, perhaps, to have forthright dishonest self-government than a self-deceiving dishonest one. At least we won't (have to pretend to)be as disappointed. In stead of asking pols what they're going to do, we just tell them to surprise us.
---------
“Above all, don't lie to yourself. The man who lies to himself and listens to his own lie comes to a point that he cannot distinguish the truth within him, or around him, and so loses all respect for himself and for others. And having no respect he ceases to love.”
― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov
-----------
You do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that you will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the state of Connecticut, so long as you continue a citizen thereof; and that you will faithfully discharge, according to law, the duties of the office of...........to the best of your abilities. So help you God.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p