Skip to main content

Republicans And Social Issues


For thirty years and more, Republicans in Connecticut have been fleeing with their pants on fire what the Democrats call “social issues,” a flight from the political battlefield – and reality – that has abandoned all the social turf to progressives, some of whom are radical social engineers with knives in their brains.

It is a serious mistake to suppose that President Barrack Obama has twice won office because his economic vision was superior to that of his Republican opponents, John McCain and Mitt Romney. Mr. Obama’s two elections were won on social issues, largely because Republicans refuse to engage Democrats on matters other than the domestic economy.

 Concerning the economy, Mr. Obama’s first election was a head fake in the direction of moderation: Mr. Obama talked a fairly moderate game during his first campaign but walked a straight and narrow progressive path once he had been elected.

Mr. Obama’s foreign policy was always a paint-by-the-numbers pacifist, utopian vision that bore little relation to objective reality. The predictable results of Mr. Obama’s foreign policy, shorn of comforting rhetoric, now lie before us: Israel has been brought under severe rocket attack by Hamas in the Gaza Strip; having annexed the Crimea, Vladimir Putin is now in the process of dismembering Ukraine; the Middle East is a boiling cauldron of Islamic extremism; ISIS opposition to Bashir al Assad of Syria, a client of Mr. Putin, has pushed its way into northern Iraq, once a client of the United States; Iran, supported by Mr. Putin, is well on its way to developing nuclear weaponry; and the United States has reduced its military spending to such a degree that the county can no longer prosecute a two-front war.

A real-politicker such as Mr. Putin, reading the signs of the times, correctly concluded that the West, led by its “lead from behind” president, would stand idly by as Russian supplied and supported sappers inside Ukraine delivered cities in the Eastern section of the country to Russia. Russian oil pipelines to Europe lie beneath the ground Mr. Putin hopes to expropriate from Ukraine, most recently by means of the direct intervention of Russian troops into Eastern Ukraine. . 

The Democrats are pursuing a health care initiative than can only succeed here in the United States by reducing insurance companies, still a significant part of Connecticut’s economy, to boutique carriers that service only those portions of the health insurance market not yet monopolized by the federal government. Obamacare is but a baby step in the direction of a European styled universal health care system. Mr. Malloy has rejoiced that Obamacare, an expensive failure in many states, is a glowing success in Connecticut. However, everyone knows that the success of Obamacare in Connecticut will depend ultimately on the success of a faltering, underfinanced, federally regulated system elsewhere in the county.  

On the abortion front, U.S. Congressman Richard Blumenthal, the “Senator from Planned Parenthood,” has introduced a bill that would prevent states from regulating the abortion industry. It is more than ironic – It is horrifyingly hilarious – that such a bill should have been introduced in the Senate by Mr. Blumenthal who, during his more than twenty year stint as Connecticut’s Attorney General, had put before the state’s General Assembly hundreds of recommendations regulating everything in Connecticut from soup to nuts. Thanks to the efforts of progressives such as Mr. Blumenthal and Mr. Malloy, Connecticut is now among the highest taxed and most regulated states in the nation. As a U.S. Senator, Mr. Blumenthal, Connecticut’s first full-fledged consumer protection Senator, has not given up regulating companies that eagerly contribute to his campaigns. But for reasons known only to himself, Mr. Blumenthal wishes the federal government to order states that they may never promulgate restrictions on abortion facilities – ever, for any reason. Mr. Blumenthal’s bill was introduced in the Senate only a few months after partial birth abortion “doctor” Kermit Gosnell was hauled off to jail for having failed to abide by laws governing late term abortion chop-shops.  Should Mr. Blumenthal’s bill pass in the Congress, future Gosnells will merrily go about their bloody business without fear of harassment from moral epigones such as Mr. Blumenthal.


In the face of the most progressive and socially experimental government in Connecticut’s history, Republicans continue to wave a white flag, conceding more than half of the political battlefield to Democrats on the mistaken premise that campaigns can be won on economic issues alone. They are wrong.

Comments

SVeley said…
Many (R's)are clamoring to remove Social issues from our National Platform. I remember a few years back at the 2012 Presidential convention some establishment (R's)from CT attempting that. These are the (R's) I and many conservatives refer to as "RINO's." Some of these establishment types even agree with higher taxes instead of spending cuts and outrageous anti-2nd amendment bills such as CT SB1160. I ask you, if you are soft on social issues, take firearm rights away from law abiding citizens and increase taxes/spending what is the difference between you and the democrats? We DON'T NEED YOU.
peter brush said…
Republicans refuse to engage Democrats on matters other than the domestic economy
-----
Alternately put, the Republicans twenty-five years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, can't explain the theoretical/empirical failures both in inefficient distribution of scarce resources and of social dysfunction of "planned" or "directed" economics (including Dannel Malloy's goofy Nutmeg government "job creation" policies). Or, put in positive terms, because we don't want to appear to be "anti-government," they can't explain the the comparative economic success and humane order of societies like South Korea over North Korea or Hong Kong over the Peoples "Republic" of China." Looking at the narrowly defined "social issues" (i.e., the attack on social traditions in favor of man-made, rational, egalitarian policies), is there any evidence that places like North Korea are less sexually repressed? Are "sex-change" operations available there? On the other hand, is there any evidence that fifty years of cradle-to-grave government management has enhanced family formation (and therefor, happiness) in the U.S. black "community?"
--------
“A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both.”
― Milton Friedman
--------
Ludwig von Mises
"The market economy is the social system of the division of labor under private ownership of the means of production. Everybody acts on his own behalf; but everybodys actions aim at the satisfaction of other peoples needs as well as at the satisfaction of his own. Everybody in acting serves his fellow citizens."
peter brush said…
Not that Mr.Foley isn't at this point making some specific proposals that would be an improvement. But, he does seem willing to make only marginal adjustments rather than to reverse the decades long Nutmeg plunge into government activism, which is the fundamental "social issue" we face.
-------------
Getting Control Over Spending

Hold spending flat for two years

Direct every department of state government to find productivity improvements...

End pension fraud and abuse

- See more at: http://www.tomfoleyct.com/landing/restoring-pride-prosperity-ct/#sthash.RSBqj8Ns.dpuf
----------
Ludwig von Mises
Full government control of all activities of the individual is virtually the goal of both national parties.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p