Skip to main content

Weicker, The GOP’s Ahab


Connecticut Commentary,” as usual, anticipated former U.S. Senator and Governor Lowell Weicker’s remarks on WNPR by nearly a week.

On May 9, Don Pesci addressed Republicans in Westbrook and mentioned Mr. Weicker at some length:

“Both Mr. Weicker and Mr. Malloy are progressives. At the root of progressivism lies the sundering notion that if government is good, more government must be better. From here it is but a baby step to the equally absurd notion that government is the state. In fact, the state is all of us, the government merely an administrative apparatus designed, if you credit the U.S. and State Constitutions, to accomplish our reason informed will. Mr. Weicker, whose ego as U.S. Senator and Governor was infinitely expansive, took this absurd logic a step further and regarded himself as the state. I should like to call your attention to the hopeful tense in that last sentence: Mr. Weicker was, he regarded– past tense: There is a God.

 “But it never hurts to remind ourselves that there is a Devil too. 
“From time to time, Mr. Weicker shows up, most often at WNPR or in the op-ed section of the Courant, to advise Republicans what they must do to become a majority party. You will never guess: They must field candidates like Mr. Weicker. But these days only progressives pay him much mind...”

Mr. Weicker ought to have retired from politics -- eighteen years of which he spent as a Republican U.S. Senator -- an honored elder statesman whose opinions on his party should have been taken with less than a ton of salt. That did not happen, largely because Mr. Weicker thought it politically useful to define himself as a maverick within his own party. In this he was extraordinarily successful, and when a parting of the ways became necessary, no tears were shed within Republican ranks when Mr. Weicker retired from politics for good, shortly after he, as governor, had imposed an income tax on his state.

Connecticut’s slow and painful decent into a reckless spending ditch began with the Weicker income tax. Connecticut is now the only state in the union that has experienced negative job growth. Maverickism does have a dark side. It also has a bright side, at least for Mr. Weicker. Connecticut’s state Republican Party is Mr. Weicker’s  President Richard “You won’t have me to kick around anymore” Nixon. Even though Mr. Weicker’s notions of what is best for his cast off party are irrelevant to most Republicans, the maverick who once fittingly described himself as “the turd in the Republican Party punchbowl” will always have his version of Republicanism to kick around.  In pronouncing his party irrelevant, Mr. Weicker hardly noticed that his state party’s irrelevance coincided rather neatly with Mr. Weicker’s nineteen year reign as the nominal head of Connecticut’s GOP.

These bull bellowings are a little sad. Mr. Weicker is stuck in a time-warp groove: He repeats himself, and repeats himself, and repeats himself… No one, other than a few aged and crusty Jacob Javits Republicans or Democratic politicians eternally grateful for the Weicker income tax and the expansion of spending it occasioned pay him much heed these days.

Mr. Weicker’s views are set in mental concrete and do not change with the times.  As a U.S. Senator and the nominal head of his state party, Mr. Weicker favored opening his party’s nominating convention to non-Republicans, thus weakening the stranglehold on the state GOP of non-maverick, loyal Republicans. He now favors blowing up the nominating conventions altogether, because nominating conventions are, like all things Republican, irrelevant.  

When Teddy Roosevelt retired from politics, he shot a few water buffaloes in Africa. Mark Twain wrote up Roosevelt’s post presidential adventure as a mass slaughter of cows. Former President Jimmy Carter built housing for the poor and wrote books no one reads. Ronald Reagan, stricken with Alzheimer’s, retired to his ranch to await with his usual good humor the grim reaper. George Bush the younger took up painting and manfully restrained himself from commenting upon the idiocies of his successor.

There really is a life after politics. But not for Mr. Weicker. Like some raving Ahab, he has strapped himself to his own White Whale with his own harpoon lines, the victories and defeats of times past.  He and the whale, a metaphorical substitute for thwarted ambition, will go down together. Supported by the Republican Party in his state for nearly two decades in Congress, Mr. Weicker has no use for nominating conventions or political parties. The depth of his ingratitude is boundless, almost blasphemous.

When Starbuck in Herman Melville’s “Moby Dick” accuses Ahab of blasphemy, the old puritan cries out, “Talk not to me of blasphemy, man; I'd strike the sun if it insulted me.”

On the last day, when the angels finally call Mr. Weicker, he will go out with a snarl on his lips and a curse against the fictional devils in his past he has not been able to exorcise. The moment will not be recorded by WNPR.



Comments

Anonymous said…
Very nice writing. Weicker abandons the GOP bedrock principle of fiscal conservatism -- and then claims the GOP left him!
Unknown said…
Unfortunately we are left with Weickers income tax legacy which will haunt this state for generations to come.
And there is no Saviour governor on the horizon.
peter brush said…
The problem, aside from Lowell Weicker's essential and perpetual fecal character vis a vis a metaphorical punchbowl, is that the Republican Party was founded in national social engineering. Anonymous (above) correct, though, in comparison to the Woodrow Wilson/Franklin Roosevelt Democrats the Republicans were social engineers with sanity.
The GOP became the home of whatever conservative movement came to be and may exist in the country. Against The Maverick's view that Reagan "hijacked" the party, the conservative movement remains but one wing of a party as yet controlled, especially here in Ct., by moderates; i.e., liberals with more or less sanity.

I maintain that one party rule is much less of a problem, perhaps not a problem at all, depending on the party. Indiana presently has one party rule, and appears to be well governed as compared to The Land of Bad Habits. Weicker suggests that the problem is that conservative "ideas" are mistaken,
implies that conservatism is racist, etc., but offers no ideas the Party should endorse. He clearly understands that the Dems are fiscally irresponsible, but rather than criticize them The Turd blames the Nutmeg State's demise on the unpopularity of the Republicans with the bought-and-paid-for urban electorate.
-----------

And we won because the party tent encompassed all philosophies … not just litmus tests. We reached out on issues that touched labor, women, the poor, gays, blacks, Latinos, the disabled, etc. …

It is not names that are important but rather the ideas that names evoke.
http://www.courant.com/news/opinion/op_ed/hc-op-weicker-connecticut-republicans-torpedoed-th-20140514,0,3201418.story
peter brush said…
the same ultra right that engineered my downfall
-------------
One gets the impression from Weicker that he lost in 1988 in a primary to William F. Buckley rather than having lost in the general election to another liberal with slightly more sanity (than Lowell). One could also get the impression that the Maverick was popular with minority pressure groups in a way that the "poisonous" tea-party is inherently, and rightly, incapable of duplicating.
-------------
Mr. Lieberman won Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven, cities with a large number of Democratic voters. He carried Waterbury, a smaller more conservative city with a Republican mayor. He also did well, though trailing Mr. Weicker, in cities like Stamford, where Vice President Bush won by significant margins.

''Tonight we made history,'' said John F. Droney Jr., the Democratic Party Chairman. Closest Race Since '54

Mr. Weicker carried traditionally Republican cities like Fairfield and Greenwich in Fairfield County. He was also running close in medium-size cities like Manchester and Meriden.
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/11/09/nyregion/1988-elections-connecticut-lieberman-upsets-weicker-close-race-margin-victory.html
Anonymous said…
Why can he not, finally, just go away.

A Connecticut Exile
Anonymous said…
Why can't he finally just go away?

Sincerely,

Exiled From CT

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p