Skip to main content

OBAMA’S CHICAGO EXPERIENCE

We know the places where Senator Obama lived as a child but not why he chose Chicago nor what he has done which bears upon the requirements of president.* Experience? Leadership? Of his activities in Chicago prior to running for the U.S. Senate, he says he was a “community organizer.”

The organization for which he community-organized was ACORN. The years were probably 1985 to 1988 when he left to attend Harvard Law School. About his relations with domestic terrorist William Ayers, he revealed only that he’s that “guy who lives in my neighborhood.” These are the themes of his pre-U.S. Senate experience and leadership, community organizing and William Ayers. On community organizing, much is known about ACORN.

ACORN (Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now), organized in 1970, physically seized an empty building owned by the City of New York and put squatters in it. The City later gave ACORN the building.

The mortgage-giant Fannie Mae between 1980 and 2007 gave ACORN $797,000, its third largest amount, according to The Wall Street Journal of July 29. When in 1993 Mr. Obama was on the Board of Directors of the Woods Fund, he saw to it that ACORN got grants.

A scandal reported by the July 13 New York Post involved Dale Rathke, the brother of ACORN’s founder. He stole $1 million from ACORN in 1999 and 2000.

Barack Obama as community organizer comes into the ACORN picture in its voter-registration activities. He made that his work as community organizer for ACORN and its Midwest Academy for training community organizers and fundraising.

In registering voters, ACORN collected fake signatures. It provided Washington State with “the largest case of voter-registration fraud in the state’s history,” reported Secretary of State Sam Reed. ACORN employees were supposed to help eligible voters complete voter-registration cards, but they submitted cards with names like “Leon Spinks, boxing champion.” The King County Canvassing Board invalidated more than 1,700 ACORN registrations. The Seattle Times editorialized, “ACORN has done some similar things in other states [14 others] and needs to be cleaned up or shut down,” according to the July, 2007, “Organizing Trends” of the Capital Research Center. It is not known that Mr. Obama had anything to do with these activities.

Colleague Sanford A. Newman said that Mr. Obama’s community work in registering voters was very successful. Newman in a similar agency, Project Vote, writes in a letter to The Wall Street Journal that Mr. Obama’s efforts were on behalf not of ACORN but of Project Vote, in 1992, when he, Newman, was national director of Project Vote. Only after 1992, says Mr. Newman, did Project Vote undertake “more projects” with ACORN. What “more”?

Be that as it may, Senator Obama is now utilizing his experience with voter-registration. According to his campaign, 3,600 trained community organizers called “Obama Organizing Fellows” are working for six weeks in 17 states in his presidential campaign.

Mr. Obama was busy with voter registration both before and after law school. At some time, probably before he left for law school, he had met and worked with Maoist William Ayers, who had graduated from bomb-throwing to Columbia University for a Ph.D. in education (not in English, as Obama reported).

Mr. Obama, upon his return from law school to Chicago, was involved with Ayers, his father and brother, in foundations whose interest, like Ayers’, was in getting control of the Chicago public schools. One was the Woods Fund, whose Board Ayers joined in 1988. It gave grants to ACORN and Obama’s and Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s church.

Prominent among foundations was the Annenberg Challenge Project, which Mr. Obama chaired and which William Ayers joined as a Board member. From 1995 to 2000, both Obama and Ayers were in the Annenberg fund. The whole idea of the Annenberg project came from Ayers.

Mr. Obama was the first Chairman of the Annenberg Challenge in 1995, when he was only two years out of law school. It was a $50-million fund (2:1 matching) to reform Chicago public education. Normally, a fresh young law-school graduate just two years out of law school was unlikely to head it, unless Ayers, who had designed the whole project, chose him. That would put the time of their association back before 1995. As both were involved in the school reform movement following the 1987 teachers’ strike, it is possible, even likely, that the Obama-Ayers association goes back that far.

The 1988 law following the 1987 Chicago teachers’ strike provided for Local School Councils of parents and community leaders. In that effort, big business teamed up with Maoist radicals from the anti-Vietnam War movement in support of the LSCs for different reasons. The Business Round Table was prominent in Connecticut in the effort to enact Outcomes-Based Education and School-to-Work into law. Still in existence, it is involved now in a public school fight in Seattle. Also involved was Ayers’ father, Thomas G. Ayers, retired CEO and Chairman of Commonwealth Edison, and a foundation director, sometimes on the same foundation subcommittee as Obama. Also involved was Ayers’ wife, Brinks-Robbery-participant Bernadine Dohrn, released after 22 years in prison, and Ayers’ brother John.

William Ayers has not openly joined the “Progressives for Obama.” It includes Weather Underground members Mark Rudd and Tom Hayden, of the 1968 take-over of Columbia University and the Chicago streets during the Democratic Convention. But this much we know: Obama’s pre-Senate experience includes campaigning, organizing, fundraising, voter registering, and public school reform.

________________________________

* Where source is not given, it is probably the blog of Stephen F. Diamond, an attorney who teaches law and political science, capital markets, the economy, corporate and international labor, at the Law School of Santa Clara University in Santa Clara , California.

By Natalie Sirkin
gnsirkin@aol.com
c2008

Comments

Carl Davidson said…
Besides just being plain wrong, you can't even get your facts straight.

I'm from Chicago, and knew about all of this. Obama was with Project Vote, he didn't work for ACORN. Tom Hayden was never a member of the Weather Underground; he was out of SDS years before in came into existence, and never supported it. And so on...

This is just a sloppy hatchet job for people you want to play as suckers
Don Pesci said…
Obama's connection with ACORN is explored in numerous articles, some of them recent: http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDZiMjkwMDczZWI5ODdjOWYxZTIzZGIyNzEyMjE0ODI=&w=Mg==

Here is a graph from one of them:

"At least a few news reports have briefly mentioned Obama’s role in training Acorn’s leaders, but none that I know of have said what Foulkes reports next: that Obama’s long service with Acorn led many members to serve as the volunteer shock troops of Obama’s early political campaigns — his initial 1996 State Senate campaign, and his failed bid for Congress in 2000 (Foulkes confuses the dates of these two campaigns.) With Obama having personally helped train a new cadre of Chicago Acorn leaders, by the time of Obama’s 2004 U.S. Senate campaign, Obama and Acorn were “old friends,” says Foulkes.
Don Pesci said…
Re: Weathermen

Their first public demonstration was its October 1969 "Days of Rage" protest in Chicago, timed to coincide with the trials of the Chicago Seven, a group of radical leftists led by Tom Hayden.

Days of Rage" leaders included Bill Ayers and Mark Rudd.

I'm sure Natalie would appreciate the clarification.

Don Pesci
Don Pesci said…
I congratulate you on your blog. Very nice.
Don Pesci said…
The line you are questioning is as follows: "It (progressives for Obama) includes Weather Underground members Mark Rudd and Tom Hayden, of the 1968 take-over of Columbia University and the Chicago streets during the Democratic Convention."

Natalie is not saying that Hayden belonged to the Weathermen. She is saying that Rudd belonged to the Weathermen and Rudd and Hayden belong to Progressives for Obama, not quite your interpretation.

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p