Skip to main content

Objects May Be Bigger Than They Appear


There is a scene in Jurassic Park in which the driver in a vehicle looks in his rear view mirror and sees for the first time a Tyrannosaurs Rex gaining on him; a little white message on the mirror informs us that “objects may be bigger than they appear.”

Alfred Hitchcock would have loved that touch.

Mayors John DeStefano and Dannel Malloy, both in hot pursuit of Democrat primary votes, have not glanced in their rear view mirrors lately.

The one thing that Democrats despise -- even more than President George Bush -- is puffed up moralists; in this respect, one thinks of Sen. Joe McCarthy, beset with personal problems and an aggressive moralist, charging that one of Joseph Welch’s attorneys had ties to a communist organization. Welch, a Boston lawyer the Army had hired to represent it in the Army/McCarthy hearings promptly denounced McCarthy with the scorching words, "Until this moment, Senator, I think I never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness." And when McCarthy persisted in his attack, Welch launched this bazooka: "Let us not assassinate this lad further, senator. You have done enough. Have you no sense of decency?" -- perhaps the most annihilating retort in recent American history.

As the primary finish line comes into view, DeStefano appears to have put the pedal to the metal in an attempt to convince the last progressive Democrat standing that he, not the pretender Malloy, is the genuine progressive article.

Does Malloy have a health care plan? It cannot be as progressive as DeStefano’s. Are Malloy’s energy and transportation plans forward looking? Sure, but they pale in comparison with DeStefano's. Does Malloy boast that he has created affordable housing in Stamford? There is too much carrot and not enough stick in the solution. DeStefano would withhold state grants and bonds for such amenities as ball fields, libraries and other local projects if towns do not shape up and build more affordable housing. "If you want to live like an island, God bless you," DeStefano said. "Finance your own projects."

An equal opportunity denouncer, DeStefano reacted – some would say over-reacted –in the time honored fashion of a progressive over-achiever to Governor Jodi Rell’s announcement that she planned to create special gun courts in shoot’em up cities. "This is a plan,” he said, “I would expect to see from the governor of Mississippi in the 1950s. Rell has done nothing to support the African American community of Hartford.

In DeStefano, progressivism has found its Savonarola. But primaries have a way of ending, at which point the influence of true believing progressive Democrats will be considerably reduced. The Tyrannosaurs Rex in the rear view mirror is the general voting public, an amalgam of Republicans of all stripes, Democrats of all stripes and unaffiliated voters. Progressives are the tail; the general voting public is the dog. Tails wag dogs only in fairy tales, and the Tyrannosaurs Rex is much bigger that it appears in DeStefano’s reckoning.

Democrats face a similar problem in their senatorial primary should supporters of primary challenger Ned Lamont succeed in ousting current Democrat senator Joe Lieberman, an ardent supporter of a war that is not popular in Connecticut. After the primary comes the general election, the pursuing Tyrannosaurs Rex.

Among the general population in Connecticut, Lieberman continues to be popular; and according to a May Quinnipiac University poll, “only 15 percent (of Connecticut voters) would vote against a candidate based only on his position on the war,” the centerpiece of Ned Lamont’s campaign. Lieberman recently served notice that he would run on an independent line should he lose the primary, a strategic move that should firm up support among Democrats who have not already pledged their troth to Lamont.

Should Lieberman win the primary, mainline Democrats will breathe a sigh of relief, and Lamont supporters will be sorely disappointed. Should Lamont win the primary, the “Nedheads” will be congratulating themselves at having displaced a senator who is more popular than Sen. Chris Dodd with a politician who may not be able to outpace the Tyrannosaurs Rex now visible in the rear view mirror.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Blumenthal Burisma Connection

Steve Hilton , a Fox News commentator who over the weekend had connected some Burisma corruption dots, had this to say about Connecticut U.S. Senator Dick Blumenthal’s association with the tangled knot of corruption in Ukraine: “We cross-referenced the Senate co-sponsors of Ed Markey's Ukraine gas bill with the list of Democrats whom Burisma lobbyist, David Leiter, routinely gave money to and found another one -- one of the most sanctimonious of them all, actually -- Sen. Richard Blumenthal."

Powell, the JI, And Economic literacy

Powell, Pesci Substack The Journal Inquirer (JI), one of the last independent newspapers in Connecticut, is now a part of the Hearst Media chain. Hearst has been growing by leaps and bounds in the state during the last decade. At the same time, many newspapers in Connecticut have shrunk in size, the result, some people seem to think, of ad revenue smaller newspapers have lost to internet sites and a declining newspaper reading public. Surviving papers are now seeking to recover the lost revenue by erecting “pay walls.” Like most besieged businesses, newspapers also are attempting to recoup lost revenue through staff reductions, reductions in the size of the product – both candy bars and newspapers are much smaller than they had been in the past – and sell-offs to larger chains that operate according to the social Darwinian principles of monopolistic “red in tooth and claw” giant corporations. The first principle of the successful mega-firm is: Buy out your predator before he swallows

Down The Rabbit Hole, A Book Review

Down the Rabbit Hole How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime by Brent McCall & Michael Liebowitz Available at Amazon Price: $12.95/softcover, 337 pages   “ Down the Rabbit Hole: How the Culture of Corrections Encourages Crime ,” a penological eye-opener, is written by two Connecticut prisoners, Brent McCall and Michael Liebowitz. Their book is an analytical work, not merely a page-turner prison drama, and it provides serious answers to the question: Why is reoffending a more likely outcome than rehabilitation in the wake of a prison sentence? The multiple answers to this central question are not at all obvious. Before picking up the book, the reader would be well advised to shed his preconceptions and also slough off the highly misleading claims of prison officials concerning the efficacy of programs developed by dusty old experts who have never had an honest discussion with a real convict. Some of the experts are more convincing cons than the cons, p